“WHY BLACK AFRICA SHOULD RESIST ARAB DOMINATION OF AU”BY CHINWEIZU

by

from vanguardngr.com

POLITICS

Why black Africa should resist Arab domination of AU
By Chinweizu

Posted to the Web: Friday, September 01, 2006

Part I: The Arab Quest for Lebensraum in Africa“

The third of the Arab community living outside Africa should move in with the two-thirds on the continent and join the African Union “which is the only space we have’ — Col. Mouammar Gadhafi of Libya, at the Arab League, 2001

Many AfriKans take great exception to the sentiments and views expressed by Col. Gadhafi at the March 2001, Amman, Jordan meeting of the Arab League. –Prof. Kwesi Kwa Prah, 2004, in a paper to the AU [both quotes in Bankie and Mchombu eds, 2006:217, 235]
Besides joining Prof. Prah and the other Afrikans who take exception to Gadhafi’s statement, I should like to point out that Gadhafi’s invitation to his fellow Arabs is nothing but a declaration of race war on Africa. It is an invitation to more Arabs to invade and colonize Africa. Indeed, it is a call for the final phase of the 15 centuries old Arab lebensraum war on Afrikans – a war to Islamise and conquer all of Africa, from Cairo to the Cape and from Senegal to Somalia, and to then enslave or Arabise all the conquered Afrikans. In order to make that clear, it is necessary to first put his invitation in the context of the traditions of Arab melanophobia and negrophobia, and of Arab expansionist ambitions and conquests that go back to the time of their Arab prophet, Mohammed.

Melanophobia and Negrophobia in Arab culture:

The following excerpt from The Crisis of Identity in Northern Sudan: A Dilemma
of a Black people with a White Culture, by Al-Baqir al-Afif Mukhtar, gives an insight into the melanophobia and negrophobia that Arab culture has reeked of since before the time of Mohammed: “The contempt towards . . . the dark skinned is expressed in a thousand ways in the documents, literature and art that have come down to us from the Islamic Middle Ages.

. . . This literature, and especially popular literature, depicts (the black man) in the form of hostile stereotypes – as a demon in fairy tales, as a savage in the stories of travel and adventure, or commonly as a lazy, stupid, evil-smelling and lecherous slave. . . . Ibn Khaldun sees the blacks as “characterized by levity and excitability and great emotionalism” and [says] that “they are everywhere described as stupid” . . . al-Dimashqi had the following to say: “The Equator is inhabited by communities of blacks who may be numbered among the savage beasts. Their complexion and hair are burnt and they are physically and morally abnormal. Their brains almost boil from the sun’s heat.”

Ibn al-Faqih al-Hamadhani follows the same line of reasoning. To him . . . the zanj . . .are “overdone until they are burned so that the child comes out between black, murky, malodorous, stinking, and crinkly- haired, with uneven limbs, deficient minds, and depraved passions. . .”

Arab-Muslim doctrines on Black enslavement:

The following excerpt [from Blasphemy Before God: The Darkness of Racism In Muslim Culture by Adam Misbah aI-Haqq, shows how and why Arabs incurably believe in enslaving blacks: “Classic Muslim thought maintained that blacks became legitimate slaves by virtue of the colour of their skin.

The justification of the early Muslim equation of blackness with servitude was found in the Genesis story so popularly called “the curse of Ham,” in reference to one of Noah’s sons . . . .In the Arab- Muslim version, blacks are cursed to be slaves and menials, Arabs are blessed to be prophets and nobles, while Turks and Slavs are destined to be kings and tyrants. . . . The famous Al-Tabari, for example, cites no less than six Prophetic traditions which seek to support this story. One tradition reads: Ham begat all those who are black and curly- haired, while Japheth begat those who are full faced with small eyes, and Shem begat everyone who is handsome of face (Arabs of course) with beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham’s descendants would not grow past their ears, and wherever his descendants met the children of Shem, the latter would enslave them.

Ahmad Ibn Hanbal reported a saying attributed to the Prophet which in effect states that God created the white race (dhurriyyah bayd) from the right shoulder of Adam and created the black race (dhurriyyah sawd) from Adam’s left shoulder. Those of Adam’s right shoulder would enter Paradise and those of the left, Perdition. Other equally racist sayings have been attributed to the Prophet in the traditions.

Contradicting this spirit, there are the sayings of the Prophet which equate the value of a person to his God-consciousness (taqwa), and to their piety without any regard to the tribal or ethnocentric concerns of a racist purport. Such [egalitarian] reports [were overshadowed by] the more deeply rooted tradition of racial bigotry . . . [emphasized by] Muslim geographers and travellers who ventured into Africa. . . . Al-Maqdisi wrote, “ . . . As for the Zanji, they are people of black colour, flat noses, kinky hair, and little understanding or intelligence.” . . . Ibn Khaldun (d. 1406CE) added that blacks are “only humans who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings.” . . . Even such luminaries as Ibn Sina considered blacks to be “people who are by their very nature slaves.” .

. . The creation or resurgence of the mythology of Ham also made darkskinned people synonymous with servitude in light-skinned Muslim thinking.

This went so far that eventually, the term abd (slave), went through a semantic development and came to specifically refer to “black slave” while lightskinned slaves were referred to as mamluks. And further on in later usage, the Arabic word came to mean “black man” of whatever status. . . .”

We can now see why, when an Arab sees anyone with black skin, all he notices is a dumb animal that he is licensed and even obliged by his religion to capture and enslave. With that background on the Arab tradition of enslaving and holding blacks in profound contempt, let us now examine the meaning of Gadhafi’s call for lebensraum.

In 2001, the Libyan leader, Gadhafi, under the cover of advancing the Nkrumahist Pan- African project of African Unity, was concluding his sub-imperial assignment to round up the African states into his Arab-dominated AU for easier muzzling and control by global imperialism. At an Arab League meeting in Amman, Jordan, Gadhafi exposed another hidden agenda of his AU project when he observed that 2/3 of the world’s [approximately 250million] Arabs now live in Africa, and he invited the rest to move into Africa and join them.

Though the Pan-African News Agency (PANA) reported it and posted it on its website, I wonder how many African leaders took note of Gadhafi’s invitation and saw the danger it poses for Africa. What Afrikans (i.e. the indigenous peoples of Africa) should particularly note is his reason for the invitation, namely, that Africa is the only space Arabs have. This is so reminiscent of the Nazi project of seizing living space, lebensraum, for the Germans from their neighbours in Eastern Europe that any sensible Afrikan must understand it as a threat to all Afrikans.

More importantly, it spells out, for all but the willfully and suicidally deaf to hear, the grand geopolitical purpose behind Arab policy and action in Africa in the last 50 years. But first, we need to put Gadhafi’s invitation in the context that allows us to appreciate the full danger to Afrikans from this enduring Arab ambition for lebensraum. Since the death of their prophet, Mohammed, Arabs have been relentlessly seizing lebensraum – living space—in Africa. Since their conquest of Egypt in 642, they have taken over all of North Africa, and most of the Nile valley and some of their tribes have even infiltrated as far west from the Nile as Lake Chad. Arabs have, by now, occupied supra-Sahara Africa and the Nile Valley, i.e. more than one-third of the African landmass, and they are still grabbing more and moving tenaciously to conquer the rest.

Arab expansionism in Africa, 640-1900

I wonder how many Afrikans today wonder how it came about that Arabs, whose homeland is the Arabian Peninsula, came to occupy all of supra-Sahara Africa, from the Sinai peninsula across to Morocco’s Atlantic coast. And what they did to the Black Egyptians, Black Berbers and other blacks who were the aborigines of all that expanse of land? Similarly, Afrikans need to inquire into why and how an Arab minority has ruled Sudan since 1956? And how did it come about that we hear of Arab tribes in Darfur, Chad and even in Nigeria’s Bornu State? Until 640 AD, there were no Arab settlers of any kind in all those places. But in that year, hungry Arab hordes desperate for plunder and greener pastures charged out of Arabia, flying the flag of their new religion, Islam, and conquered Egypt by 642. Egypt thereafter became their base for invading and seizing lebensraum all the way west to Morocco and Mauritania, and southward up the Nile.

In the first phase of conquest, an Arab raiding army reached Tangier on the Atlantic in 682. Then in the 11th Century, the Fatimids who were then ruling in Egypt, unleashed Bedouin Arab tribes, such as the Beni Hilal and Beni Sulaim, into the Maghreb. These Bedouin tribes overran as far west as Morocco in the 12th and 13th centuries, and brought about the Arabisation of the indigenous Berber population of the Maghreb whom they swamped.

They reached northern Mauritania by the 14th Century. Also in the 14th Century, Guhayna Arab tribes, edged out of Egypt, infiltrated up the Nile into Sudan. In 1820, Mohammed Ali Pasha sent an expedition from Egypt that conquered Northern Sudan by 1841. In 1869, Ismail Pasha attempted to annex the region from Juba/Gondokoro to Lake Victoria, a region that would become Uganda and Sudan’s Equatoria Province. He failed, but the British who ruled from 1899 to 1956 later incorporated Equatoria into the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. In 1874, the Jellaba-Arab slave raider, Zubair Pasha conquered Dar Fur for the Egyptians. Also in the 19th Century, Awlad Sulaiman Arabs migrated, in the 1840s, from the Fezzan in Libya into the Lake Chad area, and Shuwa Arabs in search of pasturelands moved, in the 1810s, from Chad into the Bornu area of what became Nigeria.

From the late 19th Century until the 1950s, Arab expansionism in Africa was stopped in its tracks by the European powers who conquered and partitioned Africa among themselves. Only with the retreat of European political rule did opportunity arise for Arab expansionism to resume its march. And it promptly did.

Arab expansionism in Africa since 1956, i.e. in the era of continentalist Pan-Africanism.
Continentalist Pan-Africanism was launched in 1958 at the Accra Conference of Independent African States (CIAS). It has been the dominant tendency within Pan-Africanism ever since, and it has given birth to the Arab-dominated OAU/AU. As some observers have pointed out, the Arab League, established in 1945, is the institutional organ for realizing the Arab aspirations for unity and imperial resurgence through “an Arab-Islamic empire across Africa into the Middle East.” Under its aegis, Arab nationalism resumed its expansion in Africa when, on attaining independence in 1956, the Jellaba-Arab minority government of Sudan defined Sudan as an Arab country and set out to enforce that definition on Sudan’s African majority.

Islamisation and Arabisation of Black Africa: the pilot project in Sudan:

It has been noted by Opoku Agyeman that Pan-Arabism, in its so-called ‘civilizing mission’ perceives Africa as a ‘cultural vacuum’ waiting to be filled by Arab culture “by all conceivable means” [Agyeman, 1994:30] including Islamisation, and the settlement of Arab populations on lands forcibly seized from Africans. The assumptions, objectives and methods of this project may be illustrated from the statements of its principal implementers in Sudan:
“You are aware that the end of all our efforts and this expense is to procure Negroes. Please show zeal in carrying out our wishes in this capital matter.”
–Muhammad Ali Pasha, Ruler of Egypt, 1825, in a letter to one of his generals in Sudan, quoted in [Nyaba, 2002:36]

In his 1955 book on the orbital scheme [the three circles at whose center he envisioned Egypt to be], President Nasser characterized Africa as “the remotest depths of the jungle,” and as merely a candidate for Egypt’s “spread of enlightenment and civilization” via Islamisation-Arabisation.

-Gamal Abdel Nasser, President of Egypt, 1955, quoted in [Agyeman,1994:34].

“Sudan is geographically in Africa but is Arab in its aspirations and destiny. We consider ourselves the Arab spearhead in Africa, linking the Arab world to the African continent.” -Sudanese Prime Minister, Mahgoub, 1968, quoted in [Agyeman, 1994:38]. Sudan “is the basis of the Arab thrust into the heart of Black Africa, the Arab civilizing mission.”
– President Nimeiry of Sudan, 1969, quoted in [Agyeman, 1994:39] “We want to Islamise America and Arabise Africa” – Dr. Hassan El-Turabi, chief ideologue of Jellaba-Arab minority rule in Sudan, 1999, quoted in [Nyaba, 2002:27]. “The south [Sudan] will remain an inseparable part of the land of Islam, God willing, even if the war continued for decades.”
-Osama bin Laden, April 2006, [from an edited translation of an audiotape attributed to al-Qaeda leader, Osama bin Laden, parts of which were aired by Aljazeera on April 23, 2006]

This thrusting of Arab spears into the body and soul of Black Africa through deAfrikanisation campaigns of Islamisation-Arabisation was, of course, not confined to Sudan, but has been done wherever Arabs spotted an opportunity to exploit Afrikan weakness, such as Mauritania, Chad, Somalia, Eritrea, Uganda. In the past 40 years, Libya’s Gadhafi has been particularly active in sponsoring chaos, anarchy and civil wars in Chad, Liberia, Cote d’Ivoire etc., and in trying to Islamise Uganda, Rwanda, the CAR etc. For example, in a live broadcast on Rwanda Radio on 17 May, 1985, Gadhafi said: “First, you must stick to your Islamic religion and insist that your children are taught the Islamic religion and you teach the Arabic language because without the Arabic language, we could not understand Islam. . . You must teach that Islam is the religion of Africa. . . You must raise your voice high and declare that Allah is great because Africa must be the refugee camps in neighbouring Chad. . . .
Muslim. . . We must wage a holy war so that Islam may spread in Africa. –quoted in [Bankie and Mchombu, 2006:239-240].
Why do Gadhafi and other Arabisers sponsor Islamisation? Steve Biko pointed out the fundamental reason why imperialists make a point of converting their victims to their Christian religion when he said: It has always been the pattern throughout history that whosoever brings the new order knows it best and is therefore the perpetual teacher of those to whom the new order is being brought. If the white missionaries were “right” about their God in the eyes of the people, then the African people could only accept whatever these new know-all tutors had to say about life.

The acceptance of the colonialist-tainted version of Christianity marked the turning point in the resistance of African people. [Biko, 1987:56]. Steve Biko’s observation helps explain why Arab hegemonists like Gadhafi insist on Islamising their intended victims. Since the death of their prophet, Mohammed, Islam has been the religious cloak and entry-dagger of Arab imperialism. Islamisation is used as a prelude to the project of Arabisation.

Among the targeted victims, Islam privileges the Arabic language and culture. Arab names and customs are made obligatory, and the anathema on Jahiliya discourages remembrance of the pre-Islamic, non-Arab culture of an Islamised people. It should be noted that the core Islamic countries that stretch contiguously from the Maghreb to Pakistan are fragments of the empire that Arabs conquered and ruled from 632-1517 when the Turks, under Selim the Grim, conquered Egypt and Syria and extinguished the Arab Abbasid Caliphate. Thus, the core lands of Dar-al-Islam today are a continuation of the Arab Empire. Just as the Commonwealth is the euphemistic PR name for the enduring British Empire, so too Dar-al-Islam is the euphemistic PR name for the enduring Arab Empire. In fact, Dar-al-Islam is simply the Arab empire in religious camouflage, and the Umma are the Arab citizens/masters and the non-Arab subjects of the enduring Arab Empire.

Gadhafi and the Arab lebensraum project in the 21st Century in furtherance of his lebensraum project, in May 2003, proposed a tripartite union of Libya, Sudan and Egypt, a move reminiscent of Hitler’s Anschluss project that annexed, in 1938, Austria as well as Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland. To appreciate the menace in Gadhafi’s invitation, Afrikans would do well to consider Hitler’s drive for lebensraum and how it was stopped.

Just as Gadhafi wants to enlarge Arabia inside Africa, Hitler wanted to enlarge Germany within Europe by the acquisition of a territory for settlement, which will enhance the area of the mother country, and hence not only keep the new settlers in the most intimate community with the land of their origin, but secure for the total area those advantages which lie in its unified magnitude. [Hitler, 1971: 653] Hitler looked east for Germany’s expansion in Europe. In Nazi ideology, Lebensraum meant the expansion of Germany eastward to conquer lands for Germans to settle and peoples for Germans to enslave. According to Hitler, the ideal war was one of conquest, extermination, and subjugation; the ideal area in which to conduct such a war was in the east, where the German people would win for itself the lebensraum.

The Nazi theory of Lebensraum became Germany’s foreign policy during the Third Reich. A key element in Hitler’s plan for lebensraum was the idea of military expansion and the forced expulsion of the nations of Poland, Ukraine, Russia etc. and their replacement with German settlers. The Lebensraum ideology was a major factor in Hitler’s launching of Operation Barbarossa in June 1941. As the German armies moved eastward, the Nazis began to turn large areas of Soviet territory into German settlement areas. The biggest obstacle to implementing the Lebensraum further was the fact that by the end of 1942, the Sixth Army was defeated in Stalingrad. After the second big defeat in the tank battle at Kursk during July 1943 and the Allied landings in Sicily, all further Lebensraum plans came to a halt.

USA, Australia, Russia — case studies of lebensraum.

Faced, from the 16th Century, with European invaders seeking lebensraum, the Native Americans in what became the USA, failed to muster the necessary will and forces to defeat and drive the invaders away; as a result, these indigenous peoples were exterminated and lost their continent by the late 19th Century. Bands of their remnants were herded into reservations and left to slowly die out. Similarly in the 19th Century, the Australian aborigines failed to muster the necessary will and forces to defeat and drive away the invaders from Europe. They too were exterminated. In contrast, the Russians in the 20th Century, under Stalin, mustered the necessary will and forces, defeated Hitler’s armies and chased them back all the way to Berlin and obliged Hitler to commit suicide.

As these contrasting examples make clear, seekers of lebensraum can only be stopped by decisively defeating and driving them away. How did the Russians manage to do that? First of all, their leaders took quite seriously the Nazi talk of seeking lebensraum in Eastern Europe, and prepared for war. In February 1931, Stalin predicted and warned his people: ‘We are 50 or 100 years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this lag in 10 years. Either we do it or they crush us.’ And he drove his people with the proverbial whip and scorpion, and forced them to industrialize at a desperate pace. And Russia industrialized in 10 years flat! Which was just in time to be ready when Hitler unleashed his armies on Russia in June 1941. And by 1943, Hitler’s lebensraum project lay in ruins as his mighty armies had been defeated by Stalin’s armies. It took another two years of hard fighting for the Russians to drive Hitler’s armies all the way back to Berlin. Had they not done so, there would be no Russia or Poland or Ukraine etc today. All the land from Berlin to the Urals would have been taken over and settled by Germans. And any Russians not exterminated would have been enslaved as Hitler intended.

If Afrikans want to escape at Arab hands the type of fate that Hitler planned for the Russians, we need to learn from Stalin’s example. We need to build a megastate and industrialize it at breakneck speed into a modern power. And we need to defeat the Arabs and drive them back across the Sahara.

The first step is to expel all Arab League countries from the AU, or better yet, to destroy this enemy-controlled AU and organize a Black World League of States to serve as the collective security outfit exclusively for the Blacks of the World. The second step is to militarily discourage any further Arab expansion into sub-Sahara Africa. We must firmly bear in mind that lebensraum ambitions are effected by military action, as in Sudan’s war on the SPLM, and its use of Janjawid militias in Darfur and Chad. And we must also firmly bear in mind that such ambitions are destroyed only by military action. To think of any other way is suicidal foolishness. So Gadhafi’s ambition must be finally defeated militarily by Afrikan power, and the sooner the better for Afrikans.

Part II: The Challenge to Pan-Afrikanism

First, they came for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time, no one was left to speak up for me. -Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892-1984)

In the last 15 centuries, Arab invaders have grabbed 1/3 of the African continent, and systematically enslaved, exterminated or Arabised the blacks they met there. How? I have already quoted examples from the mission statements of the anti-Afrikan leaders of the Arab expansionists since 1820 in Sudan. Let us now see examples of how they’ve gone about implementing their policy on the ground since 1956 while the OAU/AU Pan-Africanists determinedly looked the other way or buried their ostrich heads in the sand. The following are instructive excerpts, about the events in al-Di’ein and Dar Fur, from Islamisation and Arabisation of Africans as a means to Political Power in the Sudan by Sudanese scholar, M. Jalaal Haashim: al-Di’ein 1987

As its civil war with the SPLM/SPLA intensified, the Jellaba-Arabist Sudan government of al-Sadiq al-Mahdi (1986-1989) used the Baggara Arabs to punish those Dinka who lived on the border of Kordufan and Dar Fur, such as the Ngog, on the assumption that all the Dinka were SPLM/SPLA.

“The Baggara tribes in Kordufan and Dar Fur are nomadic Arabs who have been greatly influenced by the Nilotic tribes, especially the Dinka, from whom they have taken the cows for livestock and the colour of blackness . . . . Until then, the hostility between the two sides was relatively kept at bay due to their historical inter-relationship. Thousands of Dinka who fled the war zone came and lived with the Baggara. This is how in a certain village called al-Di’ein in Southern Dar Fur, more than 6,000 Dinka people peacefully took refuge and lived with the Baggara.

In 1987, the government of Sadiq al-Mahdi established the infamous Popular Defence Forces (PDF) as a pretext for officially arming the Baggara Arabs to fight the Southerners. Armed in this way, the marauding Baggara squads of PDF began making incursions into the South, raiding the Dinka villages. [These] naturally sought help from the SPLM/SPLA [who] came to the rescue . . . . In all aspects, the Baggara Arabs were unequal to the SPLA. Suffering defeat after defeat, . . . the Baggara began nursing deep hatred towards the Dinka in general, [and finally directed their revenge on] the peaceful Dinka who were living with them at al- Di’ein . . .In one day in mid 1987, at least 1,000 Dinka were massacred, 4,000 were burned alive, and the survivors – around 1,000 – were enslaved. The massacre began early in the day. At first, the bewildered Dinka did not believe what was going on. When reality dawned on them, they fled into the houses of their hosts who were also their attackers. They were dragged by their feet like animals to be butchered outside the houses of their hosts. The Dinka took refuge in the Church; there they were killed along with the priest. Then they ran and took refuge inside the Police station, which was part of the railway station, but, alas, the Police turned out to be accomplices.

They were killed there also. Whether in good or bad faith . . . they were ill-advised to take refuge in the empty carriages of a standing freight train so they could be taken away from al-Di’ein. With the trustfulness usually shown by totally vulnerable and helpless people in their eagerness to cling to a straw, they hurriedly obeyed. Once crammed inside, they were locked in from outside. Caged in like animals, they saw with their own eyes barrels full of diesel being rolled toward them. They were burnt alive, all of them. Only then, with the barbecue smell of that holocaust, did the Baggara come to their senses. The survivors were fortunate that they were only enslaved. Slavery was the common sense of that doomed day . . . . In the period 1989-1999, only God knows how many massacres like that of al-Di’ein took place.”

The Janjawid campaign of genocide:

“A decade after the Dinka massacre in al-Di’ein, the scenario of ethnic manipulation by the state expanded to cover the whole of Dar Fur and most of Kordufan, . . . [and] the era of terror of the infamous Janjawid had been launched. . . .

Dar Fur has been the victim of the involvement of the neighbouring Arab states in the civil war in Chad that flared up in the 1970s. Libya, an extreme advocate of Pan-Arabism with highly volatile policies, intervened in Chad with the sole aim of helping the Arab nomad tribes with money, logistics and arms. . . . The government of Khartoum has not only backed the nomadic Arab tribes, but has also armed them and fought by land and air along with them.

All through the decade of 1982-1992, skirmishes and limited killings were commonplace in Dar Fur. The Khartoum government dubbed them ‘armed robbery’. In 1995, the massacres were launched first against the Masalit tribe of the state of West Dar Fur. The governor himself was a Masalit Muslim brother who was given orders from Khartoum to let his sedentary people host a heavily armed clan of pastoralist Baggara who were driven out of Chad to be welcomed by the Khartoum government simply out of bias for the Arabs. . . . The Masalit welcomed the Baggara. Under the official eyes of the State government which was headed by their own son, thousands of the Masalit were butchered in mid 1995. . . . ”

Through these “gruesome atrocities . . ., which are being overtly committed by State- backed Arab tribes”, the nomadic Arab tribes of Dar Fur have been committing genocide and ethnic cleansing against the African sedentary tribes. As both the culprit and the victim are Muslims, the Afro-Arab race war nature of the genocide becomes very clear. As Jalaal Haashim points out, the conflicts in Sudan are “a racist war camouflaged with religion.”

But how exactly do these Arab marauders carry out ethnic cleansing? The next excerpt, from Singing while their men rape, THE GUARDIAN, NAIROBI Wednesday, July 21, 2004, Page 6, tells of an ongoing example of organized raping and killing and enslavement carried out by the Janjawid in Dar Fur: According to an Amnesty International report published in 2004, “While African women in Darfur were being raped by the Janjaweed militiamen, Arab women stood nearby and sang for joy . . .The songs of the Hakama, or the “Janjaweed women” as the refugees call them, encouraged the atrocities which the militiamen committed. . . . During an attack on the village of Disa in June last year, Arab women accompanied the attackers and sang in praise of the government and scorning black villagers.

According to an African chief quoted in the report, the singers said: “The blood of the blacks runs like water, we take their goods and we chase them from our area and our cattle will be in their land.” “The power of (Sudanese president Omer Hassan) al-Bashir belongs to the Arabs and we will kill you until the end, you blacks, we have killed your God.” The chief said that the Arab women also racially insulted women from the village, saying: “You are gorillas, you are black and you are badly dressed.”

The Janjaweed have abducted women for use as sex slaves, in some cases breaking their limbs to prevent them escaping, as well as carrying out rapes in their home villages, the report said. The militiamen “are happy when they rape. They sing when they rape and they tell that we are just slaves and that they can do with us how they wish,” a 37-year-old victim, identified as A, was quoted as saying in the report, which was based on over

To be continued

*Paper presented at the Global Pan-African Reparations and Repatriation Conference (GPARRC) on 25 July, 2006, at the University of Ghana, Legon, Accra.

16 Responses to ““WHY BLACK AFRICA SHOULD RESIST ARAB DOMINATION OF AU”BY CHINWEIZU”

  1. Yeye Akilimali Funua Olade Says:

    Actually was looking for this Brother’s fine article published in The Guardian,July 20,2007 on “The US of Africa”,when Guardian”s own site will not reproduce it,so had to substitute this for now. Arabs have always wanted us as their slaves and their plan to colonize Africa,bring their Arabs from out side to rule over us is the historical problem of the BLACK RACE(see Chancellor Williams,The Destruction of BLACK Civilizations).We BLACKs have been allowing the mulattoes of our race to rule over us and oppress us instead of drawing clear lines of control over this mixed part of the race and not glorifying them in anyway nor allowing them to lord it over us as happened in Black Egypt!

  2. Afrikaneye Says:

    This is simply Excellent!
    You’re teaching what is really required.
    Thank you.

  3. Seeker Says:

    I took shahada to declare that there is a Supreme Being who is neither male or female (in arabic called Allah)-One before whom there is no other and that Muhammed is It’s prophet (not the son of The Supreme Being and not the Supreme Being Itself.) I also enjoyed making Salat. I was taught that Islam was a continuation of Judaism and Cristianity. Inherentlly, I see nothing wrong in what I have been taught. I do take issues with other elements such as the male-oriented Qur’an and the polygamy. But I am a seeker and view Islam as only one door I may step through in my life. There are many more doors to go through. My question is this: Given what I understand about the origin of the Arab people being in fact so-called Ethiopians that populated the southern area of Saudi Arabia, and given that they had a highly developed spiritual system (I assume since they were Kushites) what role did Islam play in their lives ? Did they convert or is Islam a title that the semites gave to a version of the Kushite spirituality? Also, why do we treat Islam like it’s so foreign to us as “African” people when the basic spirituality of it is universal? Like anything, it can be corrupted and misused, but the Qur’an specifically speaks against oppression. Any so called Muslim practicing colonialism, imperialism, domestic violence, coerced (or manipulated) polygamy, or violent jihads to spread Islam is simply using the religion as a crutch and tool to advance his/her agenda. I take issue with those people and their systems, but I don’t see any problem with the religion itself. The qur’an speaks against slavery, the word for Adam in arabic means black (or something that evokes an image of blackness.) Islam is just one title. I think it is the arabization, not the spirituality of the religion that is at question. Please share any insights you have about what I have said and asked. By the way, what language did the Kushites speak? how did the Semite Arabs come to speak the arabic that they do and how is it related to the language of arabia’s original inhabitants?

  4. Waweru wa Mbaru Says:

    Big up man. Can I publish this article in my newspaper. Its a small newpaper called newstaps, owned and published by Kenyans in Dallas, TX. We work so closely with the Sudanese Community and the Somali Bantus in USA. Thank you

  5. Yeye Akilimali Funua Olade Says:

    It’s Brother Chinwezu who wrote the article. I am Sister who is replying to you now. Just reprint the article giving credit to the source as I have done here.Anything on the net that is not marked don’t reproduce is available for reprinting as long as you give credit to the source!

  6. Zetta Says:

    Dear Seeker I don’t knock down the door of anyone’s religion we all embrace what our hearts tells us to embrace, but after reading about the Eastern Slave trade I knew that Islam was not for me. If you are not familiar with it please research it.

  7. mercus Says:

    it was ISLAM that gave equality to everyone regardless of colour and tribe. the FIRST man to be given the honour to call the adhaan ( call to prayer) was a BLACK MAN – bilal who was a slave . he was freed by the greatest companions of the prophet PBUH when he saw him being crushed because he refused to give up his conviction to ( there is one god but god and muhammed is his final messenger)

    it was the way of the messenger of god PBUH who invited and guaranteed the christains and the Jews a safe haven in madina fro there oppressors

    what you are referring to is ARABS and pagans who slave black people the same people burried there daughters alive

    it would be higly foolish for me to link christanity to “the crusades” . YES it was CHRISTains who went by the sword to conquer the lands and have “Pork Police” in spain to check if the newly converted christains ate there pork

    but all this is not christanity – it is the works of claimed christains – it was not approved by JESUS an was not inline with the scriptors….yes muslim leaders and people have commited attrocoties…but it wasnt islam ……likewise i cannot say the 100,000’s of killings in iraq, afganistan, vietnam etc was christanic…SIMPLY cos of christain leadership

    you are standing here talking about islam and racism…..it was less then 70 years ago in america where a black man couldnt sit in the same bus as a white man, drink from the same fountain

    it was only 130 years ago in MODERN britain we had the FEUDEL system ( run by christain – but not to say it was approved by jesus or inline with its scriptors) where a farmers son could only become a farmer, a balcmsmiths son only become a blacksmith, a docors son recieve eucation etc

    it was less then 140 years ago a CHRSITAIN GATHERING in france was set up to determine CAN WOMEN BE CONSIDERED AS HUMAN

    but this is not christanity and should not be associated to it. we claim to love jesus..dance around on a sunday morning saying his name. we walk out and he is forgotten. if someone truely loved someone he would be close to him …..our youth love 50 cent, maddona, etc….the one whom you love becomes your mirror your ole model…….they buy his/her CD’s wear cloths like them, act and talk like them, memmorise there lyrics have posters of them

    what do we have of jesus ? how often do you remember him in a day ? o you dress like him ? mirror his chracter ? i dont even see this in the church

    muslims are frowned upon and laughed at because they grow beards….JESUS HAD A BEARD and if u loved him to a extend that he is worthy of loving you would also wear a beard.

    the most remebered person and loved person ever walked this earth was MUHAMMED PBUH the seal of the messengers, there is NO OTHER MAN whos life has been recorded to the vast extend then the messenger of god. almost every sentence he spoke has been recorded. almost everything he did was recorded.

    and there is no other person on this planet who is a mirror to the people.

    people awake and go to sleep with the prayer he said, before they eat like he did, grow a beard, dress like him, take on the perosnality and his actions, send 1000’s of greetings of peace and salutations on him PBUH,

    to send peace upon him and abraham 5 times a day.
    Islam is a moderate religion that is not extreme….but the middle way in every aspect with tolerence…nether do we reject him like the jews did calling him a imposter …and neither do we give and go to the other extreme and proclaim he is god or give him divine attributes… or partner, son of god

    may god guide us all

  8. Piye Says:

    Excellent post by Chinweizu, I like your recommended solution, it is the only way, if Africa is to survive. Currently the Arabicized Sudanese government and the Chinese Government are constructing the Kajbar dam that will drown Nubian monuments. It is obvious that they are trying Nubian history. Nubia, a culture older than Egypt, and true world empire in the ancient world . Can you imagine, they can just do this to our culture? The temples with their hieroglyphics, the statues, the pyramids….all gone.
    Nubia, should be a Holy Land for all Africans, and indeed we need to rally around the cause of the Nubians. A people without a history are a tree without roots, as Garvey once said. For sure, we can’t allow the destruction of our history by the Arabs and Chinese. I’ve added a link to a petition that aims to prevent this dam. Please pass this on to everyone you know.

    http://www.petitiononline.com/Appeal/petition.html

    Hopefully, I will reproduce this article on my site and of course, I will give a credit to Chinweizu.

  9. long live subsahara africa Says:

    Give praises to the Hague that they only now seek to charge the demon president of Sudan when his genocide campaign has brutally murdered 3,000,000 blacks but it was wrong to kill a few peace keepers and this puppet world feels they have done good for Sudan.
    Actually they might cause worst conditions for black darfurians if the president is charged and note he might not relinquish himself without a full scale fight or may i say a full scale genocide.these so called arabs are being fooled by white arabs that they are arabs and must cleanse the sudan of blacks when they in turn will only use them to occupy the land later cleanse the socalled arabs just like how the white used indians to locate blacks then enslaved the same indians.
    It not my opinion but sudan literally means THE LAND OF THE BLACKS, so how are a minority about 10% ruling sudan.
    first of all the au should not have members of the socalled middle east such as Egypt,Libya etc the au should be ssau{sub-sahara african union} .Ethiopia might need to be excluded too ,because these arabized blacks are as far as i am concerned acting in arabs interest to cleanse the land of black africans.
    this was a part of a speech a sudanese black retold of her experience,i gathered this from a website .{ attackers said, “this land does not belong to black people”, and that as women were being raped, their abusers told them “I am going to give you an Arab baby who will take your land”}.
    they are telling the truth and this race mixing is a form of genocide if not one of the worst forms.the biracial children grow up to hate black people more than other races since they view the black side as a curse and tends to distant themselves from the black and will hate th black race including close family members .take for example in brazil they boast that they are a very mixed nation and thus they have no racism there .COMPLETELY WRONG,they failed to explain how the nation became so mixed through being extremely racist.the whites thought the blacks that they were hideous and dumb
    and they needed to get a white partner to escape the curse not to be passed on to their siblings other case of racism in race mixing is that the white slave masters denied the black men of breeding first born children to their wives but that they shall impregnate their wives to remind them for the rest of their lives that the whiteman has the power over you forver and and thus destroying his dignity and self esteem.
    white people have managed to change the degrading status of their albino diseses leprocy skin tone to one of the most desired in this world today.but who give a government the power in most case ,the ordinary citizens right.so until people come to their senses abouth the grave disadvantages of pale skin this world will always be a white mans paradice .dont stress over the black puppets who bleach their lovely dark ancient egyptian skin or the blacks who straighten their afro of biblical moses leave them to be stooges for the whiteman we dont need week persons in our army or we will crumble and suffer defeat like the arab invaders did to our past brothers and sisters in north africa, just make sure that when they get skin cancer look them in the eye and pity them but with a look that will make them feel so embaraced that they ultimately regret wanting to be white and you slide your palms over dark skin to make them burst out in tears.
    lots of individuals told me,”the day black people unite the world will end ” and i completely agree. i mean no country cannot survive without poor people much less this world . imagine the whole of sub sahara africa uniting to form one country ,one language,one religion,one black tribe regardless of colour .no wars ,no famine ,no genocide,no discrimination,no higher caste or lower caste just black kings and queens.
    with the immense minerals and land and brains from nigerians who are said to be the most brilliant groups of persons worldwide ,with all qualities and abilities sub sahara africa would well be on track to be a super power by the end of the 21st centuary only to be envied by other nations around the world but sorry to say easier said than than done especially the current status of black people worldwide.
    all we can do right now is hope for the best of africa and her children that one day we will return to our former egyptian nubian glory which was stolen from us and from then was all down hill a very steep hill for black people

  10. Koang Jijury Says:

    Actually Prof. Chinwezu has pinpointed what most arabized Africans may afraid to said, I hope God of Africa will keep his soul a live in years to come so he can continue his great work. we are learning a lots from you.
    south Sudanese KJ.

  11. Mbarika Kazingizi Says:

    For someone who has endlessly face booked and blogged about Arab encroachement on Africa from lthe north and the white encroachment from the Cape – it is a relief to come across an organised and intellectual piece of writing on the issues related to that. Will also share this extensively.

    There has been a new learning and therefore a new orientation for me in this, as regards Gaddafi.

    • bola ar Says:

      Really Mbarika? Why are u crying for Kadafi now after writing above on 23/3/10 about Kadafi?? Why?? Let your no be your no, and your yes be your yes!!!

  12. Bolaji Ekow Arogundade Says:

    Kadafi is a hardened criminal and a mass murderer of Afrikan people in Chad and in Niger! He tried many times in the past to steal Chad and Niger from the Afrikans there in the eighties and nineties and it was late President Ronald Reagan of the USA and the late President Mitterrand of France who prevented him from stealing Chad and Niger. He is also involved in one way or the other on the genocide and mass killings perpetrated on the Afrikan people in Darfur so he and his fellow Arabs could steal Darfur from the Afrikans there! Hardened criminal Kadafi is having his way cos most of Afrikan people worldwide including the puppet rulers of Afrikan people are sleeping and in slumber!

    The puppet rulers in Afrika allowed the notorious mass murderer of Afrikan people Kadafi to become AU leader. If it had been EU and genocide on Europeans and the occupation of 40% of Europe by Kadafi and the people of his fellow Asiatic Arab tribe and race, it would never happen in Europe and on Europeans!

    Kadafi and his people know it very well that a time will come when they will be removed from the Afrikan continent with brute force and be made to pay for their two thousand plus years of their endless crimes, atrocities. barbarism, evils, their destruction of Afrikan culture, their stealing; seizure and illegal occupation of Afrikan lands for two thousand plus years and etc., etc.

    However, Kadafi is just doing the last bit of his evils even though he knows all these very well that he and his fellow Arabs will be removed from the Afrikan continent cos they will not be there forever and the time has come for it!!!

  13. Qasim Says:

    the writer of this article is what in america would be called a house negro in Islam every man is equal regardless of his colour race or creed.

    Ofcourse being a slave to the white image of christ blinds the stupid as it has done with the author of this article who has lied about everything.

  14. Bolaji Ekow Arogundade Says:

    Are u referring to me Qasim? If so, are u an Afrikan or an Arab? Go and read the books, the destruction of black civilisation by Chancellor Williams; colonising the Afrikan mind by Chinweizu; the general history of Afrika by UNESCO and the Arab invasion of Egypt by J Butler, ok! The facts of Arab crimes, attrocities, barbarism and horrors on Afrikan people for 2000 plus years are all there. And also Arab crimes, atrocities and slavery on Afrikan people are still going on till today on the Afrikans in Darfur, Mauritania, Western Sahara, North Afrika and in North East Afrika – which they falsely call Middle East.

    For your information, i am not a house negro but a very conscious Afrikan and a Pan Afrikanist, ok!! Stop your fuken lies and go and read books of facts. If u were an Afrikan and u wrote this u would be classified as a traitor to the Afrikan race. In the future, Afrika will hunt u down as a traitor and punish u very well.

    I am not into alien xtianity and Caucasian Jesus christ, nor am i into alien islam and alien bhudist and alien hindu, i am an Afrikan religion worshipper and i worship Ogun and Shango the Gods of thunder, fire, lightning and iron. As stupid and as foolish as u are, i also need to tell u that i am not a slave to the Caucasians nor to the Arabs and also to Kadafi.

    U better tell Kadafi and his people to get out of our lands in the Afrikan continent before the arrival of (what the Arabs called) the “DEJAL” who will be black and deal with them on our lands when he arrives, he isn’t far from coming, ok! Food for thought!!

    Everything i wrote here and in the first writing were all truth! U are the liar and the imbecile and a fool!!

  15. muzinkala Says:

    Our crisis right now is our arabized brothers and sisters who defends islam like it’s really a holy fountain of life; and doing that at the expense of Afrikan culture and destiny.
    But are we suppose to be surprised here! No!
    The dangers of adopting foreign cultures, and religious concepts is working against them. Hence they denounce their being by embracing islam.
    They’re just slaves!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: