Archive for December, 2007

OBAMA,RACE AND THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY FROM YAHOO NEWS

December 28, 2007

FROM yahoo.news

——————————————————————————–

Opinion
Obama, Race, and the Right Side of History
Stacy Parker Aab Fri Nov 30, 4:44 PM ET

ABC News reports that Sen. Obama spoke to a “mostly black audience” last night at the world-famous Apollo Theatre in Harlem. Hmm. From where I sat in the mezzanine, the makeup of the audience was under whispered debate. 1 in 5? 1 in 4? Maybe. No. The guys behind us debated this. My friend Trey and I debated it. While the place wasn’t as white the home town crowd at a Utah Jazz game, I feel I can say with certainty, after walking past the wrapped-around-the-block lines 2x (once at 6:30pm, and again at 7:30pm), that while there was plenty of color in the audience, this was in no way was this a “mostly black audience.”

I ask: is there anything wrong with that?

It was clear that Obama pulled a great cross-section of progressives, young and old, every shade of the spectrum to attend this $50 a head event. What could be called “skewing white” I think of as simply support that is more representative of America as a whole. Why Obama pulls this kind of support, Juan Williams explores in today’s Times . Regardless of the why, I’m still struck by the image of two young white men two rows down, who literally high-fived and clasped hands when Obama entered the stage. Now, perhaps they’d just won some bet about whether his neck-tie would match the backdrop. All I know is that I witnessed unchecked enthusiasm and affection, and I was moved.

Chris Rock gave the best line of the night, and it’s already getting tons of play. After acknowledging that lots of white people came Uptown for the event, he talked to black folks in particular: “You’d be real embarrassed if he won and you wasn’t down. ‘I had that white lady. What was I thinking?'”

However, to me, the most beautiful and radical ideas were posited by the speaker that introduced Chris Rock, and that was Professor Cornel West. Prof. West came on like fire and brilliance in his black suit, black tie, and hanging loop of gold watch chain. He asked the crowd how it felt to be on “the right side of history.” He rhetorically put his arms around Obama’s shoulders, saying Obama was “his brother, companion, and comrade…[that] there’s a difference between being eloquent and articulate. [Obama’s] eloquent. He’s a good brother…his character and judgment always trumps the pseudo-rhetoric about his experience.”

Prof. West went on to make the case for something rather radical in contemporary American politics: embracing a candidate for who he really is–his authentic self–and not who we wish he could be, or insisting that he should be like those who came before. He spoke of how we don’t expect one great musical artist to sound or be like any other great musical artist–and that we shouldn’t expect Obama to be a carbon copy of the great civil rights leaders of the past, either: “We accept Obama for who he is.”

And who he is is someone rather special. The more people get to know Obama, the more people listen to him speak and not just rely upon other peoples’ received insights, I predict that the worries that it’s “too soon” or “people just aren’t ready” will truly start to melt away. Obama hasn’t been thrust out there like some unripe affirmative action candidate. As the Time cover says, this man is a contender.

Having watched one too many politicians cross the River Styx–that process of losing true connection to their authentic, best selves, and with that, connection to their core principals, becoming, as my friend Trey calls “pod people”–how refreshing it is to be exhorted to embrace someone for who he truly is: an amazing universe unto himself, someone who knows deeply how black men have to wear “the mask” in this culture, but also knows that his own face is beautiful and good enough to win people over in this election. And at home and abroad, once he’s our president.

——————————————————————————–

Copyright © 2007 HuffingtonPost.com. All rights reserved. The information contained in Huffington Post commentary may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without prior written authority of huffingtonpost.com.

“MELANIN GIVES BLACK PEOPLE SUPERIOR PHYSICAL,MENTAL AND SPIRITUAL ABILITY” FROM DESTEE.COM FORUM

December 22, 2007

FROM destee.com

Melanin gives Black people superior physical, mental & spiritual ability.

#1 12-16-2003, 11:02 AM
The PeoplesMan
MEMBER Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0

Melanin gives Black people superior physical, mental & spiritual ability.

——————————————————————————–

Melanin refines the nervous system in such a way that messages from the
brain reach other areas of the body most rapidly in Black people, the
Original People. Black infants sit, stand, crawl and walk sooner than
whites, and demonstarte more advanced cognitive skills than their white
counterparts because of their abundance of Melanin. Carol Barnes writes
“…your mental processes (brain power) are controlled by the same
chemical that gives Black humans their superior physical (atheltics,
rhythmic dancing) abilities. This chemical… is Melanin!” The
abundance of Melanin in Black humans produces a superior organism
physically, mentally and spiritiually. This why all the founders of the
world’s great religions are Black. Melanin is the neuro-chemical basis
for what is called SOUL in Black people. In the same way Blacks excel in
athletics, they can excel in all other areas as well (like they did in
the past!) once the road blocks are removed!

Is God Black? The Original Man was BLACK, “made in the IMAGE of God” his
Parent, according to scared books. Children look like their parents.
All the other races are but diluted variations of the Original Black Race.
(see pages 7 &

Most whites have calcified pineal glands which thwarts Melatonin
production, therby limiting their moral capacity. Located in the brain,
the tiny pineal & pituitary glands regulate the body’s other glands.
Esoteric tradion regards the area of these glands as the third eye, seat
of the soul, and the mystical Uraeus represented by the cobra on the
forehead of Egyptian royalty/crowns. Why did Africans view the European
as a child of God, but the Europeans viewed the African as a soulless
savage? Because of “melatonin,” described as a mentally & morally
stimulating humanizing hormone produced by the pineal gland. Scientific
research reveals that most whites are unable to prduce much melatonin
because their pineal glands are often calcified and nonfunctioning.
Pineal calcification rateswith Africans si 5-15%; Asians – 15-25%;
Europeans -60-80%! This is the chemical basis for the cultural diffences
between Blacks and whites, causing some Black scholars to raise the
question that the European approach, that of the logical, erect, ridgid,
anti-feeling posture, reflects a left brain orientation and reflects that
they lack the chemical key of melatonin to turn on their unconscious and
therefore cannot get into feelings. Carol Barnes writes “Melanin is
responsible for the existence of civilization, philosophy, religion,
truth, justice, and righteousness. Individuals (whites) containing low
levels of Melanain will behave in a barbaric manner.” Melanin give
humans the ability to FEEL because it is the absorber of all frequencies
of energy. Dr. Welsing wrties “Since melanin is a superior absorber of
all energy , it is essential to establish this understanding of God and
‘all energy.’ The fact thaat the albinos (whties) lack melanin may also
help to explain …why, in the view of many non-white peooples, they
(whit4es) lack ‘spirituality” and the capacity to tune in to, and therby
establish harmony and justice…”

The scientific evidence of Melanin threatens the ideology of white supremacy.

After considering Melain to be a “waste” product of body-metabolism which
“served no useful function,” Western (white) science has now discovered
that Melanin is the chemical key to life and the brain itself! All
studies and facts about Melanin suggest that after 400 years of
attempting to inferiorize the Black race, “Western science is facing the
sobering reality that, by its own self-defined standards, Black people
are probably superior to whites in both intellectual potential and muscle
coordination.” (Sepia magazine interview). The central role Melanin
plays in the body has been “suppressed to maintain the mythological
inferiority of blacks…and the defensive clinging to whiteness as some
token of superiority.” (Dr. Richard King) The “superiority complex” of
white people is a defense mechanism and a mas for their deepset
inferiority complex which they project onto people of color.
Psychologists say insistent denial means readlity in the opposite way.
If whites really believed that white skin was “superior,” why is “tanning”
so important in white culture despite its known health risks (thousands
die annually from skin cancer). Also, curling or permming lifeless,
straight hair, and the lastest; lip injections for a fuller look! And it
is the white female who tells you that her ideal mate is “tall, DARK, and
handsome!” “Dark” indeed refers to more Melanin!

“Messed-up Melanin” is killing Melanated people!

In their ongoing effort to destroy people of color, whites create
“designer durgs,” structured to chemically bind with and alter the
Melanin molecule, causing it to become toxic and even fatal to highly
melanated people! Carol Barnes, who documents this subject writes,
“MELANIN can become toxic to the Black human because it combines with
harmful drugs such as a cocaine, amphtamines, pyscholic, hallucinoge…
marijuana…etc.” The molecules of these drugs resemble the Melanin
molecule! The body is fooled and its balance is thrown off as it relies
on its drug-wrecked Melanin in order to function. Even legal drugs such as
tetracyclines, neurolepts (tranquilizers), have strong affinity for bind
to Melanin. Herbicides (paraquats,’agent orange’ [dioxin]) bind
irreversibly with Melanin & remain in the Black human throughout life
causing many disorders. Drug abuse by Blacks is more likely to occur
because Melanin causes Blacks to become addicted faster and stay addicted
longer from thses drugs which are deliberately placed in Black
communites. Drugs are destroying the heart of Native American and Black
society, causing many deaths.

For more information on the wonders of Melanin: Dr. Richard King’s superb
African Origin of Biological Psychiatry and Carol Barnes’ information
rich Melanin: The Chemical Key to Black Greatness (C. Barnes, Box
3009189,Houston Texas, 77230). Also the technical paper Melanin, The
Organizing Molecule by Dr. Frank Barr, discoverer of Melanin’s organizing
ability & other properties (Institute for Study of consciousness (510)
849-4784 /2924 Benvenue Ave., Berkeley CA 94704).

The PeoplesMan
View Public Profile
Find all posts by The PeoplesMan

#2 12-16-2003, 04:16 PM
Sekhemu
MEMBER Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,679
Rep Power: 56

Quote:
Originally Posted by The PeoplesMan
Melanin refines the nervous system in such a way that messages from the
brain reach other areas of the body most rapidly in Black people, the
Original People. Black infants sit, stand, crawl and walk sooner than
whites, and demonstarte more advanced cognitive skills than their white
counterparts because of their abundance of Melanin. Carol Barnes writes
“…your mental processes (brain power) are controlled by the same
chemical that gives Black humans their superior physical (atheltics,
rhythmic dancing) abilities. This chemical… is Melanin!” The
abundance of Melanin in Black humans produces a superior organism
physically, mentally and spiritiually. This why all the founders of the
world’s great religions are Black. Melanin is the neuro-chemical basis
for what is called SOUL in Black people. In the same way Blacks excel in
athletics, they can excel in all other areas as well (like they did in
the past!) once the road blocks are removed!

Is God Black? The Original Man was BLACK, “made in the IMAGE of God” his
Parent, according to scared books. Children look like their parents.
All the other races are but diluted variations of the Original Black Race.
(see pages 7 &

Most whites have calcified pineal glands which thwarts Melatonin
production, therby limiting their moral capacity. Located in the brain,
the tiny pineal & pituitary glands regulate the body’s other glands.
Esoteric tradion regards the area of these glands as the third eye, seat
of the soul, and the mystical Uraeus represented by the cobra on the
forehead of Egyptian royalty/crowns. Why did Africans view the European
as a child of God, but the Europeans viewed the African as a soulless
savage? Because of “melatonin,” described as a mentally & morally
stimulating humanizing hormone produced by the pineal gland. Scientific
research reveals that most whites are unable to prduce much melatonin
because their pineal glands are often calcified and nonfunctioning.
Pineal calcification rateswith Africans si 5-15%; Asians – 15-25%;
Europeans -60-80%! This is the chemical basis for the cultural diffences
between Blacks and whites, causing some Black scholars to raise the
question that the European approach, that of the logical, erect, ridgid,
anti-feeling posture, reflects a left brain orientation and reflects that
they lack the chemical key of melatonin to turn on their unconscious and
therefore cannot get into feelings. Carol Barnes writes “Melanin is
responsible for the existence of civilization, philosophy, religion,
truth, justice, and righteousness. Individuals (whites) containing low
levels of Melanain will behave in a barbaric manner.” Melanin give
humans the ability to FEEL because it is the absorber of all frequencies
of energy. Dr. Welsing wrties “Since melanin is a superior absorber of
all energy , it is essential to establish this understanding of God and
‘all energy.’ The fact thaat the albinos (whties) lack melanin may also
help to explain …why, in the view of many non-white peooples, they
(whit4es) lack ‘spirituality” and the capacity to tune in to, and therby
establish harmony and justice…”

The scientific evidence of Melanin threatens the ideology of white supremacy.

After considering Melain to be a “waste” product of body-metabolism which
“served no useful function,” Western (white) science has now discovered
that Melanin is the chemical key to life and the brain itself! All
studies and facts about Melanin suggest that after 400 years of
attempting to inferiorize the Black race, “Western science is facing the
sobering reality that, by its own self-defined standards, Black people
are probably superior to whites in both intellectual potential and muscle
coordination.” (Sepia magazine interview). The central role Melanin
plays in the body has been “suppressed to maintain the mythological
inferiority of blacks…and the defensive clinging to whiteness as some
token of superiority.” (Dr. Richard King) The “superiority complex” of
white people is a defense mechanism and a mas for their deepset
inferiority complex which they project onto people of color.
Psychologists say insistent denial means readlity in the opposite way.
If whites really believed that white skin was “superior,” why is “tanning”
so important in white culture despite its known health risks (thousands
die annually from skin cancer). Also, curling or permming lifeless,
straight hair, and the lastest; lip injections for a fuller look! And it
is the white female who tells you that her ideal mate is “tall, DARK, and
handsome!” “Dark” indeed refers to more Melanin!

“Messed-up Melanin” is killing Melanated people!

In their ongoing effort to destroy people of color, whites create
“designer durgs,” structured to chemically bind with and alter the
Melanin molecule, causing it to become toxic and even fatal to highly
melanated people! Carol Barnes, who documents this subject writes,
“MELANIN can become toxic to the Black human because it combines with
harmful drugs such as a cocaine, amphtamines, pyscholic, hallucinoge…
marijuana…etc.” The molecules of these drugs resemble the Melanin
molecule! The body is fooled and its balance is thrown off as it relies
on its drug-wrecked Melanin in order to function. Even legal drugs such as
tetracyclines, neurolepts (tranquilizers), have strong affinity for bind
to Melanin. Herbicides (paraquats,’agent orange’ [dioxin]) bind
irreversibly with Melanin & remain in the Black human throughout life
causing many disorders. Drug abuse by Blacks is more likely to occur
because Melanin causes Blacks to become addicted faster and stay addicted
longer from thses drugs which are deliberately placed in Black
communites. Drugs are destroying the heart of Native American and Black
society, causing many deaths.

For more information on the wonders of Melanin: Dr. Richard King’s superb
African Origin of Biological Psychiatry and Carol Barnes’ information
rich Melanin: The Chemical Key to Black Greatness (C. Barnes, Box
3009189,Houston Texas, 77230). Also the technical paper Melanin, The
Organizing Molecule by Dr. Frank Barr, discoverer of Melanin’s organizing
ability & other properties (Institute for Study of consciousness (510)
849-4784 /2924 Benvenue Ave., Berkeley CA 94704).

I gotta give you unlimited props for posting this information. Melanin is the medium back to God/Goddess hood. This obviously cannot be achieved by being diluted with mixing with the human artificial i.e. Caucasian

Hetep

Sekhemu

#3 12-21-2003, 09:52 PM

em hotep

——————————————————————————–

shri sa hetep

tru indeed, melanin is the key.

whats funny is that i recently read an article, talking about how white masons actually EAT black pineal glands!

NileReflection
View Public Profile
Find all posts by NileReflection

#4 12-22-2003, 03:58 PM
Sekhemu
MEMBER Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,679
Rep Power: 56

Quote:
Originally Posted by NileReflection
shri sa hetep

tru indeed, melanin is the key.

whats funny is that i recently read an article, talking about how white masons actually EAT black pineal glands!

THey certainly are eating black pineal glands. Nobody ever seems to talk about all the missing black children between the ages of 11 and 17. There is a scripture somewhere in the bible, I can’t recall where it is, but is says we will become food for our oppressor

Sekhemu
View Public Profile
Send email to Sekhemu
Find all posts by Sekhemu

#5 01-04-2004, 09:33 PM
Mawelulu1Luv
MEMBER Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In tha Northwest Corner of “Turtle Island”
Posts: 144
Rep Power: 9

Oh my Lawd…
WhereD U read dat???

Mawelulu1Luv
View Public Profile
Send email to Mawelulu1Luv
Find all posts by Mawelulu1Luv

#6 01-13-2004, 02:47 PM
Sekhemu

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mawelulu1Luv
Oh my Lawd…
WhereD U read dat???

If you have to ask, no need to tell you what the source is!

Sekhemu

Melanin True Black History

——————————————————————————–

Quote:
Originally Posted by The PeoplesMan
Melanin refines the nervous system in such a way that messages from the
brain reach other areas of the body most rapidly in Black people, the
Original People. Black infants sit, stand, crawl and walk sooner than
whites, and demonstarte more advanced cognitive skills than their white
counterparts because of their abundance of Melanin. Carol Barnes writes
“…your mental processes (brain power) are controlled by the same
chemical that gives Black humans their superior physical (atheltics,
rhythmic dancing) abilities. This chemical… is Melanin!” The
abundance of Melanin in Black humans produces a superior organism
physically, mentally and spiritiually. This why all the founders of the
world’s great religions are Black. Melanin is the neuro-chemical basis
for what is called SOUL in Black people. In the same way Blacks excel in
athletics, they can excel in all other areas as well (like they did in
the past!) once the road blocks are removed!

Is God Black? The Original Man was BLACK, “made in the IMAGE of God” his
Parent, according to scared books. Children look like their parents.
All the other races are but diluted variations of the Original Black Race.
(see pages 7 &

Most whites have calcified pineal glands which thwarts Melatonin
production, therby limiting their moral capacity. Located in the brain,
the tiny pineal & pituitary glands regulate the body’s other glands.
Esoteric tradion regards the area of these glands as the third eye, seat
of the soul, and the mystical Uraeus represented by the cobra on the
forehead of Egyptian royalty/crowns. Why did Africans view the European
as a child of God, but the Europeans viewed the African as a soulless
savage? Because of “melatonin,” described as a mentally & morally
stimulating humanizing hormone produced by the pineal gland. Scientific
research reveals that most whites are unable to prduce much melatonin
because their pineal glands are often calcified and nonfunctioning.
Pineal calcification rateswith Africans si 5-15%; Asians – 15-25%;
Europeans -60-80%! This is the chemical basis for the cultural diffences
between Blacks and whites, causing some Black scholars to raise the
question that the European approach, that of the logical, erect, ridgid,
anti-feeling posture, reflects a left brain orientation and reflects that
they lack the chemical key of melatonin to turn on their unconscious and
therefore cannot get into feelings. Carol Barnes writes “Melanin is
responsible for the existence of civilization, philosophy, religion,
truth, justice, and righteousness. Individuals (whites) containing low
levels of Melanain will behave in a barbaric manner.” Melanin give
humans the ability to FEEL because it is the absorber of all frequencies
of energy. Dr. Welsing wrties “Since melanin is a superior absorber of
all energy , it is essential to establish this understanding of God and
‘all energy.’ The fact thaat the albinos (whties) lack melanin may also
help to explain …why, in the view of many non-white peooples, they
(whit4es) lack ‘spirituality” and the capacity to tune in to, and therby
establish harmony and justice…”

The scientific evidence of Melanin threatens the ideology of white supremacy.

After considering Melain to be a “waste” product of body-metabolism which
“served no useful function,” Western (white) science has now discovered
that Melanin is the chemical key to life and the brain itself! All
studies and facts about Melanin suggest that after 400 years of
attempting to inferiorize the Black race, “Western science is facing the
sobering reality that, by its own self-defined standards, Black people
are probably superior to whites in both intellectual potential and muscle
coordination.” (Sepia magazine interview). The central role Melanin
plays in the body has been “suppressed to maintain the mythological
inferiority of blacks…and the defensive clinging to whiteness as some
token of superiority.” (Dr. Richard King) The “superiority complex” of
white people is a defense mechanism and a mas for their deepset
inferiority complex which they project onto people of color.
Psychologists say insistent denial means readlity in the opposite way.
If whites really believed that white skin was “superior,” why is “tanning”
so important in white culture despite its known health risks (thousands
die annually from skin cancer). Also, curling or permming lifeless,
straight hair, and the lastest; lip injections for a fuller look! And it
is the white female who tells you that her ideal mate is “tall, DARK, and
handsome!” “Dark” indeed refers to more Melanin!

“Messed-up Melanin” is killing Melanated people!

In their ongoing effort to destroy people of color, whites create
“designer durgs,” structured to chemically bind with and alter the
Melanin molecule, causing it to become toxic and even fatal to highly
melanated people! Carol Barnes, who documents this subject writes,
“MELANIN can become toxic to the Black human because it combines with
harmful drugs such as a cocaine, amphtamines, pyscholic, hallucinoge…
marijuana…etc.” The molecules of these drugs resemble the Melanin
molecule! The body is fooled and its balance is thrown off as it relies
on its drug-wrecked Melanin in order to function. Even legal drugs such as
tetracyclines, neurolepts (tranquilizers), have strong affinity for bind
to Melanin. Herbicides (paraquats,’agent orange’ [dioxin]) bind
irreversibly with Melanin & remain in the Black human throughout life
causing many disorders. Drug abuse by Blacks is more likely to occur
because Melanin causes Blacks to become addicted faster and stay addicted
longer from thses drugs which are deliberately placed in Black
communites. Drugs are destroying the heart of Native American and Black
society, causing many deaths.

For more information on the wonders of Melanin: Dr. Richard King’s superb
African Origin of Biological Psychiatry and Carol Barnes’ information
rich Melanin: The Chemical Key to Black Greatness (C. Barnes, Box
3009189,Houston Texas, 77230). Also the technical paper Melanin, The
Organizing Molecule by Dr. Frank Barr, discoverer of Melanin’s organizing
ability & other properties (Institute for Study of consciousness (510)
849-4784 /2924 Benvenue Ave., Berkeley CA 94704).

Your brain and body can’t function without Black Melanin!
Few people know what Melanin, the pigment that colours the skin & hair, is
Found in almost every organ of the body and is necessary in order for the
brain and nerves to operate, the eyes to see, and the human body to reproduce! At the core of your brain is found the “locus coeruleus,” a
Structure that is BLACK because it contains large amounts of (neuro) Melanin which is essential for it to operate! In fact, all the most
Crucial brain structures contain a heavy concentration of melanin, Melanin in the brain
Increases from the lower primates and reaches its peak in the BLACK HUMAN.
“All humans possess this Black internal brain evidence of their common black African Origin. The All Black neuro-melanin nerve tract of the brain is profound proof that the human race is a Black race, with many variations of Black, from Black-Black to White-Black, all internally rooted in a vast sea of Brain Blackness.” (Dr. Richard King)
Melanin is the chemical key to life itself!
It is the major organizing molecule for living systems!
It’s found everywhere! -in animals, plants (that’s why raisins are brown), soil, oceans, clouds even stars & comets!
It is essentially linked to the DNA of the genes!
It shows the potential to reproduce itself!
Black Melanin is necessary in order for humans to reproduce!
Melanin is present at the inception of life: a Melanin sheath covers
both the sperm and the egg! In the human embryo, the melanocytes (skin pigment cells), brain and nerve cells all originate from the same place; the neural crest. Melanocytes resemble nerve cells and are essential for conveying energy. When Melanin is missing or insufficient in the Ectoderm of the early embryo (blastula),this causes the mother to lose her baby; in the case of whites, a defective baby is produced.
Black Melanin is the super absorber of all forms of energy. It has “black hole” properties. It can convert light to sound and back again!
It stores, transforms and conducts energy!
The colour of Black is the perfect absorber of light and all energy frequencies, giving Black Melanin these properties! Thus scientists
Describe Melanin as acting like a “black hole.” Melanin can rearrange its chemical structure to absorb ALL wavelengths of energy (sunlight,
X-rays, music, radar) and can transmute and store this energy for later use! In The Isis Papers, Dr. Cress Welsing writes that Melanin gives us the ability to use our bodies as direct connections with the God Force,
The source of all Energy -like plugging a cord into a wall socket. It also gives our hair antennae-like ability. (see page about black peoples hair)
How does Melanin cause racial differences?
The science of Genetics shows that Blacks can produce all races but it is impossible for a brown, yellow or white race to produce a black race. A
A Japanese scientist showed that inside melanocytes (pigment cells) are tiny packets called melanosomes that contain melanin. The four stages in the maturing of these melanosomes counts for racial differences:
Stage 1: The melanosome is empty & doesn’t have the machinery to make melanin.
Stage 2: The melanosome has the machinery to make melanin, but is empty of melanin.
Stage 3: The machinery is there and the melasosome is half filled with melanin.
Stage 4: The machinery is there and the melanosome is completely filled with melanin.
Whites have mainly stages 1 & 2, whereas all people of colour have melanin, with Blacks having more of stage 4.
Other amazing facts about Black Melanin:
Melanin granules are “central computers” and may analyze and initiate body responses without informing the brain.
Melanin slows ageing & protects you from damaging
Effects of sunlight. The Darker your skin (genetically) the less it ages. Thus whites often
Have wrinkled skin in their 30s while Blacks often have smooth, unwrinkled skin even in “old” age.
All people of colour have Melanin circulating in the blood due to spillage from the melanosomes (Melanin packets).
People containing high levels of Melanin (mainly Blacks) will always show a positive test for the use of marijuana! The chemical species found
In the urine which indicates someone’s use of marijuana is also found in the urine of Blacks!
The Melanin molecule is so stable that it has been found in 150-million-year-old dinosaur fossils! It is highly resistant to
Chemical and physical analysis, thus its precise structure is unknown!
“BLACKNESS” is a divine, cosmic principle of the Universe.
BLACK is the meaning of Kam or Khem -the name which the ancient Egyptians called themselves. From this word we get “Chemistry,” the study of the building blocks of Life. Life is founded upon CARBON, the Black element present in all living matter. Black carbon atoms link to form Black Melanin, which has “Black Hole” properties! Black Holes are found at the centre of our own galaxy and countless others. In physics, a “Black Body” is known to be a perfect absorber and perfect radiator of all forms of light and energy. This “Black Body Radiation” is at work in the electron, as shown by Nobel prize winner, Richard Feynman. The electron is responsible for ALL “Khem-ical” changes in matter. It has been
Present since the creation of the universe. The scientist, Jean Charaon proved that the electron has all the properties of the Black Hole, plus it exchanges “Black Photons” with other electrons, enabling it to continuously accumulate data. This means that if we view the electron as a carrier of memory, it has experienced everything in creation since the very beginning. Blackness is fundamental to the operation of the Universe of Energy. God is the Giver of All Energy: “Blackness” (not darkness) allows the perfect reception of all wavelengths of Energy
Melanin gives Black people superior physical, mental & spiritual ability.
Melanin refines the nervous system in such a way that messages from the brain reach other areas of the body most rapidly in Black people, the Original People. Black infants sit, stand, crawl and walk sooner than whites, and demonstrate more advanced cognitive skills than their white counterparts because of their abundance of Melanin. Carol Barnes writes “…your mental processes (brain power) are controlled by the same chemical that gives Black humans their superior physical (athletics, rhythmic dancing) abilities. This chemical… is Melanin!” The abundance of Melanin in Black humans produces a superior organism
Physically, mentally and spiritually. This why all the founders of the world’s great religions are Black. Melanin is the neuro-chemical basis
For what is called SOUL in Black people. In the same way Blacks excel in athletics, they can excel in all other areas as well (like they did in the past!) once the road blocks are removed!
Is God Black? The Original Man was BLACK, “made in the IMAGE of God” his Parent, according to scared books. Children look like their parents.
All the other races are but diluted variations of the Original Black Race.
Most whites have calcified pineal glands which thwarts Melatonin production, thereby limiting their moral capacity. Located in the brain, the tiny pineal & pituitary glands regulate the body’s other glands.
Esoteric tradition regards the area of these glands as the third eye, seat of the soul, and the mystical Uraeus represented by the cobra on the
Forehead of Egyptian royalty/crowns. Why did Africans view the European? As a child of God, but the Europeans viewed the African as a soulless
savage? Because of “melatonin,” described as a
mentally & morally stimulating humanizing hormone produced by the pineal gland. Scientific reveals that most whites are unable to produce much melatonin because their pineal glands are often calcified and non-functioning.
Pineal calcification rates with Africans are 5-15%; Asians – 15-25%; Europeans -60-80%! This is the chemical basis for the cultural differences
Between Blacks and whites, causing some Black scholars to raise the question that the European approach, that of the logical, erect, rigid,
Anti-feeling posture reflects a left brain orientation and reflects that they lack the chemical key of melatonin to turn on their unconscious and therefore cannot get into feelings. Carol Barnes writes “Melanin is responsible for the existence of civilization, philosophy, religion,
Truth, justice, and righteousness. Individuals (whites) containing low levels of Melanin will behave in a barbaric manner.” Melanin gives humans the ability to FEEL because it is the absorber of all frequencies of energy. Dr. Welsing writes “Since melanin is a superior absorber of all energy, it is essential to establish this understanding of God and ‘all energy.’ The fact that the albinos (whites) lack melanin may also help to explain …why, in the view of many non-white peoples they
(Whites) lack ‘spirituality” and the capacity to tune in to, and thereby establish harmony and justice…”
The scientific evidence of Melanin threatens the ideology of white supremacy.
After considering Melanin to be a “waste” product of body-metabolism which “served no useful function,” Western (white) science has now discovered that Melanin is the chemical key to life and the brain itself! All studies and facts about Melanin suggest that after 400 years of attempting to make inferior the Black race, “Western science is facing the sobering reality that, by its own self-defined standards, Black people are probably superior to whites in both intellectual potential and muscle coordination.” (Sepia magazine interview
The central role Melanin plays in the body has been “suppressed to maintain the mythological inferiority of blacks…and the defensive clinging to whiteness as some token of superiority.” (Dr. Richard King) The “superiority complex” of white people is a defence mechanism and a mask for their deepest
Inferiority complex which they project onto people of colour. Psychologists say insistent denial means reality in the opposite way.
If whites really believed that white skin was “superior,” why is “tanning” so important in white culture despite its known health risks (thousands?
Die annually from skin cancer). Also, curling or perm Ming lifeless, straight hair, and the latest; lip injections for a fuller look! And it is the white female who tells you that her ideal mate is “tall, DARK, and handsome!” “Dark” indeed refers to more Melanin!
“Messed-up Melanin” is killing Melanated people!
In their ongoing effort to destroy people of colour, whites create “designer drugs,” structured to chemically bind with and alter the Melanin molecule, causing it to become toxic and even fatal to highly
Melaninated people! Carol Barnes, who documents this subject, writes,
“MELANIN can become toxic to the Black human because it combines with harmful drugs such as cocaine, amphetamines, psychotic, hallucinogens…
Marijuana…etc.” The molecules of these drugs resemble the Melanin molecule! The body is fooled and its balance is thrown off as it relies
On its drug-wrecked Melanin in order to function. Even legal drugs such as
Tetracyclines, neurolepts (tranquilizers), have strong affinity to bind to Melanin. Herbicides (paraquats,’agent orange’ [dioxin]) bind irreversibly with Melanin & remain in the Black human throughout life causing many disorders. Drug abuse by Blacks is more likely to occur because Melanin causes Blacks to become addicted faster and stay addicted
Longer from these drugs which are deliberately placed in Black communities. Drugs are destroying the heart of Native American and Black
Society, causing many deaths.

IssaEl22
View Public Profile
Find all posts by IssaEl22

#8 04-28-2004, 06:39 PM
Sekhemu

Quote:
Originally Posted by IssaEl22
Your brain and body can’t function without Black Melanin!
Few people know what Melanin, the pigment that colours the skin & hair, is
Found in almost every organ of the body and is necessary in order for the
brain and nerves to operate, the eyes to see, and the human body to reproduce! At the core of your brain is found the “locus coeruleus,” a
Structure that is BLACK because it contains large amounts of (neuro) Melanin which is essential for it to operate! In fact, all the most
Crucial brain structures contain a heavy concentration of melanin, Melanin in the brain
Increases from the lower primates and reaches its peak in the BLACK HUMAN.
“All humans possess this Black internal brain evidence of their common black African Origin. The All Black neuro-melanin nerve tract of the brain is profound proof that the human race is a Black race, with many variations of Black, from Black-Black to White-Black, all internally rooted in a vast sea of Brain Blackness.” (Dr. Richard King)
Melanin is the chemical key to life itself!
It is the major organizing molecule for living systems!
It’s found everywhere! -in animals, plants (that’s why raisins are brown), soil, oceans, clouds even stars & comets!
It is essentially linked to the DNA of the genes!
It shows the potential to reproduce itself!
Black Melanin is necessary in order for humans to reproduce!
Melanin is present at the inception of life: a Melanin sheath covers
both the sperm and the egg! In the human embryo, the melanocytes (skin pigment cells), brain and nerve cells all originate from the same place; the neural crest. Melanocytes resemble nerve cells and are essential for conveying energy. When Melanin is missing or insufficient in the Ectoderm of the early embryo (blastula),this causes the mother to lose her baby; in the case of whites, a defective baby is produced.
Black Melanin is the super absorber of all forms of energy. It has “black hole” properties. It can convert light to sound and back again!
It stores, transforms and conducts energy!
The colour of Black is the perfect absorber of light and all energy frequencies, giving Black Melanin these properties! Thus scientists
Describe Melanin as acting like a “black hole.” Melanin can rearrange its chemical structure to absorb ALL wavelengths of energy (sunlight,
X-rays, music, radar) and can transmute and store this energy for later use! In The Isis Papers, Dr. Cress Welsing writes that Melanin gives us the ability to use our bodies as direct connections with the God Force,
The source of all Energy -like plugging a cord into a wall socket. It also gives our hair antennae-like ability. (see page about black peoples hair)
How does Melanin cause racial differences?
The science of Genetics shows that Blacks can produce all races but it is impossible for a brown, yellow or white race to produce a black race. A
A Japanese scientist showed that inside melanocytes (pigment cells) are tiny packets called melanosomes that contain melanin. The four stages in the maturing of these melanosomes counts for racial differences:
Stage 1: The melanosome is empty & doesn’t have the machinery to make melanin.
Stage 2: The melanosome has the machinery to make melanin, but is empty of melanin.
Stage 3: The machinery is there and the melasosome is half filled with melanin.
Stage 4: The machinery is there and the melanosome is completely filled with melanin.
Whites have mainly stages 1 & 2, whereas all people of colour have melanin, with Blacks having more of stage 4.
Other amazing facts about Black Melanin:
Melanin granules are “central computers” and may analyze and initiate body responses without informing the brain.
Melanin slows ageing & protects you from damaging
Effects of sunlight. The Darker your skin (genetically) the less it ages. Thus whites often
Have wrinkled skin in their 30s while Blacks often have smooth, unwrinkled skin even in “old” age.
All people of colour have Melanin circulating in the blood due to spillage from the melanosomes (Melanin packets).
People containing high levels of Melanin (mainly Blacks) will always show a positive test for the use of marijuana! The chemical species found
In the urine which indicates someone’s use of marijuana is also found in the urine of Blacks!
The Melanin molecule is so stable that it has been found in 150-million-year-old dinosaur fossils! It is highly resistant to
Chemical and physical analysis, thus its precise structure is unknown!
“BLACKNESS” is a divine, cosmic principle of the Universe.
BLACK is the meaning of Kam or Khem -the name which the ancient Egyptians called themselves. From this word we get “Chemistry,” the study of the building blocks of Life. Life is founded upon CARBON, the Black element present in all living matter. Black carbon atoms link to form Black Melanin, which has “Black Hole” properties! Black Holes are found at the centre of our own galaxy and countless others. In physics, a “Black Body” is known to be a perfect absorber and perfect radiator of all forms of light and energy. This “Black Body Radiation” is at work in the electron, as shown by Nobel prize winner, Richard Feynman. The electron is responsible for ALL “Khem-ical” changes in matter. It has been
Present since the creation of the universe. The scientist, Jean Charaon proved that the electron has all the properties of the Black Hole, plus it exchanges “Black Photons” with other electrons, enabling it to continuously accumulate data. This means that if we view the electron as a carrier of memory, it has experienced everything in creation since the very beginning. Blackness is fundamental to the operation of the Universe of Energy. God is the Giver of All Energy: “Blackness” (not darkness) allows the perfect reception of all wavelengths of Energy
Melanin gives Black people superior physical, mental & spiritual ability.
Melanin refines the nervous system in such a way that messages from the brain reach other areas of the body most rapidly in Black people, the Original People. Black infants sit, stand, crawl and walk sooner than whites, and demonstrate more advanced cognitive skills than their white counterparts because of their abundance of Melanin. Carol Barnes writes “…your mental processes (brain power) are controlled by the same chemical that gives Black humans their superior physical (athletics, rhythmic dancing) abilities. This chemical… is Melanin!” The abundance of Melanin in Black humans produces a superior organism
Physically, mentally and spiritually. This why all the founders of the world’s great religions are Black. Melanin is the neuro-chemical basis
For what is called SOUL in Black people. In the same way Blacks excel in athletics, they can excel in all other areas as well (like they did in the past!) once the road blocks are removed!
Is God Black? The Original Man was BLACK, “made in the IMAGE of God” his Parent, according to scared books. Children look like their parents.
All the other races are but diluted variations of the Original Black Race.
Most whites have calcified pineal glands which thwarts Melatonin production, thereby limiting their moral capacity. Located in the brain, the tiny pineal & pituitary glands regulate the body’s other glands.
Esoteric tradition regards the area of these glands as the third eye, seat of the soul, and the mystical Uraeus represented by the cobra on the
Forehead of Egyptian royalty/crowns. Why did Africans view the European? As a child of God, but the Europeans viewed the African as a soulless
savage? Because of “melatonin,” described as a
mentally & morally stimulating humanizing hormone produced by the pineal gland. Scientific reveals that most whites are unable to produce much melatonin because their pineal glands are often calcified and non-functioning.
Pineal calcification rates with Africans are 5-15%; Asians – 15-25%; Europeans -60-80%! This is the chemical basis for the cultural differences
Between Blacks and whites, causing some Black scholars to raise the question that the European approach, that of the logical, erect, rigid,
Anti-feeling posture reflects a left brain orientation and reflects that they lack the chemical key of melatonin to turn on their unconscious and therefore cannot get into feelings. Carol Barnes writes “Melanin is responsible for the existence of civilization, philosophy, religion,
Truth, justice, and righteousness. Individuals (whites) containing low levels of Melanin will behave in a barbaric manner.” Melanin gives humans the ability to FEEL because it is the absorber of all frequencies of energy. Dr. Welsing writes “Since melanin is a superior absorber of all energy, it is essential to establish this understanding of God and ‘all energy.’ The fact that the albinos (whites) lack melanin may also help to explain …why, in the view of many non-white peoples they
(Whites) lack ‘spirituality” and the capacity to tune in to, and thereby establish harmony and justice…”
The scientific evidence of Melanin threatens the ideology of white supremacy.
After considering Melanin to be a “waste” product of body-metabolism which “served no useful function,” Western (white) science has now discovered that Melanin is the chemical key to life and the brain itself! All studies and facts about Melanin suggest that after 400 years of attempting to make inferior the Black race, “Western science is facing the sobering reality that, by its own self-defined standards, Black people are probably superior to whites in both intellectual potential and muscle coordination.” (Sepia magazine interview
The central role Melanin plays in the body has been “suppressed to maintain the mythological inferiority of blacks…and the defensive clinging to whiteness as some token of superiority.” (Dr. Richard King) The “superiority complex” of white people is a defence mechanism and a mask for their deepest
Inferiority complex which they project onto people of colour. Psychologists say insistent denial means reality in the opposite way.
If whites really believed that white skin was “superior,” why is “tanning” so important in white culture despite its known health risks (thousands?
Die annually from skin cancer). Also, curling or perm Ming lifeless, straight hair, and the latest; lip injections for a fuller look! And it is the white female who tells you that her ideal mate is “tall, DARK, and handsome!” “Dark” indeed refers to more Melanin!
“Messed-up Melanin” is killing Melanated people!
In their ongoing effort to destroy people of colour, whites create “designer drugs,” structured to chemically bind with and alter the Melanin molecule, causing it to become toxic and even fatal to highly
Melaninated people! Carol Barnes, who documents this subject, writes,
“MELANIN can become toxic to the Black human because it combines with harmful drugs such as cocaine, amphetamines, psychotic, hallucinogens…
Marijuana…etc.” The molecules of these drugs resemble the Melanin molecule! The body is fooled and its balance is thrown off as it relies
On its drug-wrecked Melanin in order to function. Even legal drugs such as
Tetracyclines, neurolepts (tranquilizers), have strong affinity to bind to Melanin. Herbicides (paraquats,’agent orange’ [dioxin]) bind irreversibly with Melanin & remain in the Black human throughout life causing many disorders. Drug abuse by Blacks is more likely to occur because Melanin causes Blacks to become addicted faster and stay addicted
Longer from these drugs which are deliberately placed in Black communities. Drugs are destroying the heart of Native American and Black
Society, causing many deaths.

Issa, If I’m not mistaken Destee forum rules prohibit members from using copywritten excerpts from authors here, you may wanna consult Destee persoanally before you do that again..

Peace

#9 05-01-2004, 12:18 AM
Joyce
MEMBER Join Date: May 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,698
Rep Power: 38

So you are saying that all men are not created equal? That there is a superior race? I thought that all races had their strengths and weaknesses…hmmm. Now I’m gonna be upfront and tell you that I didn’t read all of that stuff bout Melanin and all. Just talk plain to me because I am not as intelligent as you are. Make it plain to me Shekemu…please???

Joyce
View Public Profile
Visit Joyce’s homepage!
Find all posts by Joyce

#10 05-01-2004, 07:24 AM
Sekhemu
MEMBER Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,679
Rep Power: 56

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joyce
So you are saying that all men are not created equal? That there is a superior race? I thought that all races had their strengths and weaknesses…hmmm. Now I’m gonna be upfront and tell you that I didn’t read all of that stuff bout Melanin and all. Just talk plain to me because I am not as intelligent as you are. Make it plain to me Shekemu…please???

My name is Sekhemu Joyce, not Shekemu.

I could make it plain to you. Sure. The passages above were excerpted from the book called the African Origin of biological psychiatry. By a black man named Richard King M.D. In a nutshell black people have a melanated Pineal gland, unlike white people. And because of this melanated gland and the abundance of melanin in our skin and central nervous system, among other places in the body. We have a spiritual advantage and indeed access to levels of conciousness that allows us to leave this dimension and time continuum. However I’m very hesitant to elaborate any further, due to the fact that you subscribe to a belief that white people are equal to blacks.

There is no reason for me to give any further explanation of this, particuliarly when I know you believe that the man named Yeshua came to save all people. I don’t agree with that notion

Sekhemu
View Public Profile
Send email to Sekhemu
Find all posts by Sekhemu

User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who’s Online Search Forums Forums Home Black Welcome Center The Front Porch Thank You Thank You Thank You !!! Black Poetry – Written and Spoken Word Black Poetry – Get Your Flow On! Black Poetry – Quiet Peaceful Flow Lounge Black Poetry Critiques Black Poetry Spoken Word Black Poetry Haiku Black Short Stories Poet Of The Week Black Poetry Slamfest Winners BROTHER KLABBARON – FEBRUARY WINNER! SISTER NITA MAE – MARCH WINNER! BROTHER KEITA – APRIL WINNER! Black Authors – Books – Writing – Poetry Discussion Black Chat – Voice and Video Chat Forum Black Chat Discussion Forum Black Chess Players Black Chess Players Discussion Black Chess Players Tutorials Black Teacher’s Lounge – Online Classes Online Classes – Be a Teacher! Brother OldSoul Sister Destee Chief Elder Osiris Sister River Sister Yemoja’s Goddess Brother Alkebulan Sister’s Only Chat Brother’s Only Chat Friday Night Poetry ThrowDown! Open Forum and All Other Topics Black People Open Forum Black Men – Brothers – Warriors Black Women – Sisters – Warriors Black Teenagers – Teenz Exprezzed! Black People Doing Positive Things Black Natural Hair Black Relationships Black Parenting Black Education / Schools Black Spirituality Religion Black/African Study of Spiritual Belief Systems African Traditional African Traditional Religion Study Group Pert Em Heru / Kemetian Texts Text – Pert Em Heru Metu Neter Volumes I and II The Old Testament Islam Islam Study Group Judaic Judaic Study Group Christianity Christianity Study Group Buddhism Buddhism Study Group Pan African Black History Culture Honoring Black Ancestors Black Money Business Jobs Black Travel Black Geeks Black Web Site Owners Black College Experience Black Health Beauty Aqil – Black Astrology Amun-Ra Black Recipes – Share Yours! COOKING DISCUSSION – No Recipes Here POULTRY RECIPES BEEF / LAMB RECIPES PORK RECIPES FISH RECIPES VEGETABLE RECIPES BREADS / PASTA RECIPES DESSERT RECIPES BEVERAGE RECIPES OTHER RECIPES Black Entertainment Black Sports Black Events Black Picture Album IMAGE GALLERY Black Jokes Humor Community Technical Support Black Technical Support Administration Black Site Announcements Black Site Suggestions Questions Management, Rules & Violators Support Those Who Support Us SEVENTHFAM Flatrate Utilities Gothic Leather & Gifts Black Land Studies Black People Chat Ausar Auset Society Keita’s Corner Ebony Minds Song Beats Rap Beats Reparation / Repatriation Counter-Racism.Com

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
African Disapora in Arabia Indian Iran Palestine Sopdet Pan African 5 03-29-2007 07:54 AM
Black consciousness ngumbi Pan African 3 10-12-2003 02:08 PM

Visit These Sites
African American Business Directory – Black Chess Players

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 AM.

Black People – Black People Meet – Contact Us – Advertise – Privacy – TOS/Rules – Archive – Destee – Top

Destee
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 – 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

MORE ON THE BOOK “MELANIN THE CHEMICAL KEY TO BLACK GREATNESS” BY CAROL BARNES FROM SUZAR COM

December 22, 2007

from suzar.com

Blacked Out Through Whitewash
by SUZAR
Pages from Chapter 5
Copyrighted

Page 57

Most whites have calcified pineal glands
apparently thwarting their production of Melatonin

Why did Afrikans view the European as a child of God, but the Europeans viewed the Afrikan as a soulless savage? Because of “melatonin,” described as a mentally and morally stimulating hormone produced by the pineal gland. According to scientific research, most whites are unable produce much of this hormone because their pineal glands are often calcified and non-functioning. The pineal calcification rates with Afrikans is 5-15%; Asians ­15-25%; Europeans ­60-80%! 1 Dr. Richard Kings states “When we talk about cultural differences, some black scholars have raised the question that the European approach, that of the logical, erect, rigid, anti-feeling posture, reflects a left brain orientation and reflects that they lack the chemical key [melatonin] to turn on their unconscious and therefore cannot get into feelings…” Carol Barnes writes “Melanin is responsible for the existence of civilization, philosophy, religion, truth, justice, and righteousness. Individuals (whites) containing low levels of Melanin will behave in a barbaric manner.” Melanin gives humans the ability to FEEL because it is the absorber of all frequencies of energy. Since whites have the least amount of Melanin, this is why they are perceived by People of Color as generally being rigid, unfeeling (heartless), cold, calculating, mental, and “unspiritual.” Their historical behavior towards nonwhites often confirms this.

The scientific evidence of Melanin threatens the life of white supremacy
After considering Melanin to be a “waste” product of body-metabolism which “served no useful function,” Western science has now discovered that Black Melanin (neuromelanin) is the chemical key to life and the brain itself. All the studies, facts, and statistics about Melanin suggest that after four hundred years of attempting to inferiorize the Black race, “Western science is facing the sobering reality that, by its own self-defined standards, Black people are probably superior to whites in both intellectual potential and muscle coordination.” 2 The central role that melanin plays in the body has been “suppressed to maintain the mythological inferiority of blacks…and the defensive clinging to whiteness as some token of superiority.”

The “superiority complex” of white people
is a mask for their deepset inferiority complex
which they project onto people of color. They have an inferiority complex about their lack of color in a world where everyone else (the majority) is colored. If Albinos really believed white skin was “superior,” then why is “tanning” so important in white culture despite its known health risks? (thousands of whites die annually from skin cancer). In fact, Albinos are now making Melanin tanning ointments. The Wall Street Journal (8/26/88) reported that companies are developing Melanin-based products to help whites tan safely: a California company is developing a Melanin ointment that blocks the entire spectrum of burning ultraviolet rays; researchers in Arizona are testing an ointment that stimulates the skin to produce a natural melanin tan before you go out to the sunlight. And it is the white female who tells you her ideal mate is “tall, DARK, and handsome!” “Dark” indeed refers to more Melanin!
.

“The white man or white species is a genetically defective species. Their MELANOCYTES, MELANOSOMES, and MAST CELLS, etc., do not contain the proper catalyst concentration, chemical reactivity and/or electrical charge needed to produce significant levels of MELANIN in various MELANIN Centers throughout their bodies. Therefore, their organs and systems which depend upon MELANIN to work effectively do not operate well and may suffer numerous disorders such as rapid aging, cancer…” 3

.1) King, AOB, 58-59. 2) Sepia Magazine interview with Dr. Richard King. 3) Barnes, 19.
.

.

Page 58

.”Messed-up Melanin” is killing Black people!

.In their ongoing effort to destroy People of Color, whites (scientists, chemists) create “designer drugs” that are specially structured to chemically bind with the Melanin molecule and cause Melanin to become toxic to Blacks! The molecules of these drugs resemble the Melanin molecule. The body is thus fooled and its balance is thrown off as it relies on its messed up Melanin in order to function. Major culprits include cocaine, crack, and yes, marijuana.

Blacks get addicted faster, stay addicted longer, and suffer the worse…
from these drugs which are deliberately placed in Black communities. In his vital book, MELANIN: The Chemical Key to Black Greatness, ­essential reading for all Melanated People, Carol Barnes clearly documents this subject along with the wonders of Melanin. He shows how illegal drugs alter or change Melanin’s chemical structure and thus alter many life supporting activities. Toxic drugs and chemicals are destroying the heart of Black society and causing many deaths. Barnes writes:
.

“MELANIN can become toxic to the BLACK HUMAN because it combines with harmful drugs such as cocaine, amphetamines, psycholic, hallucinogens, neuroleptic (tranquilizers), marijuana, ‘agent orange’…paraquats, tetracyclines…” 1

.Toxic drugs such as cocaine, LSD, and even marijuana are very similar to Melanin and the sub-units that make up the Melanin substance. Many health-conscious Blacks consider marijuana to be a safe healthy herb, not realizing that once this (or any herb) is “cooked,” it becomes a drug as far as your body is concerned!
Even legal drugs (tetracyclines, neuroleptics, etc.) have a remarkable affinity for reacting with or binding to Melanin and may be toxic to all Melanin centers in the Black human.
Other culprits which bind with Melanin and cause death for Blacks are aromatic and lipid compounds. Melanin shows extreme affinity for binding with “aromatic and lipid compounds.” 2 Lipid means fat. Lipid or fat compounds (fatty acids) are animal and vegetable oil /fats used for frying and cooking. Examples are shortening and corn oil. Aromatic compounds contain benzene, a major component of gasoline.
Herbicides (paraquats, agent orange, etc.) bind irreversibly with Melanin and remain in the Black human throughout life causing many disorders. Hence Blacks especially, should buy organically grown food.
Most Blacks test positive in the urine test for marijuana! People having high levels of Melanin or a high number of pigmented centers, such as the Black human, tend to show a positive test for the use of marijuana because the chemical species found in the urine which indicates someone’s use of marijuana is also found in the urine of Black humans.
.

Further Information
­ MELANIN: The Chemical Key to Black Greatness
by Carol Barnes

­ Jazzy Melanin by Carol Barnes

­ African Origin of Biological Psychiatry
by Dr. Richard King

­ MELANIN: A Key To Freedom by Dr. Richard King

­ Handbook for a Melinated, Melatonin-Friendly Lifestyle
by Dr. Patricia Newton

­ The Melanin Symposium (video/audio tapes)
Institute of Karmic Guidance (see Resources)

.1) Barnes, MCK, 32. 2) Ibid.
.

All contents are Copyrighted by Suzar (Dr. S. Epps). Website by EppsPro.com

“AFRICAN HEBREWS SINK ROOTS DEEPER INTO HOLY LAND” BY REUTERS CANADA,CA.TODAY.REUTERS.COM NOV. 2007

December 16, 2007

from ca.today.reuters.com

African Hebrews sink roots deeper into Holy Land
Tue Nov 6, 2007 7:16 PM EST

By Avida Landau
DIMONA, Israel (Reuters) – Four decades after they heard what they call an angel’s order to leave the United States and move to Israel, a vegan community popularly known as “the Black Hebrews” is about to get its own piece of the Holy Land.

Identifying themselves as African Hebrew Israelites, about 300 African-Americans arrived in 1969 in the sleepy desert town of Dimona, claiming to be descendants of the ancient Israelites and a right to settle in the Jewish state.

Despite observing Jewish holidays and practices, they were never recognized as Jews by Israeli authorities, but were allowed to remain. Their legal status has been resolved, and the government granted them permanent Israeli residency.

But fire services warned their homes in the small government-owned compound — which they call the “Village of Peace” — may be a fire hazard. So Dimona Mayor Meir Cohen and the government decided to give the community of about 3,000 Hebrews their own tract of land in the town.

On their new property, they hope not only to construct more comfortable dwellings, but also to build tourist attractions such as a wellness resort, health treatment clinics and restaurants, all reflecting the community’s lifestyle.

“We are really excited. It gives us a chance to further expand on the things we have begun to do in this country and I think also to share those benefits on a more stable foundation with the wider community,” said Prince Immanuel Ben-Yehuda, a white cloth-dressed spiritual leader of the community.

HOLISTIC

Members of the community, where English is the spoken language and the children wear colorful African-style robes and white headcovers, believe a completely vegan diet of locally grown fruits and vegetables, along with regular exercise and holistic health treatments, are keys to longevity and health.

A medical study conducted in Dimona by U.S. university researchers in 1998 found the community was largely free of illnesses typical to African-Americans such as hypertension, obesity and high cholesterol.

“We expect to have something of a resort area where visitors will come, experience the lifestyle of the community, and as a point of rest and relaxation — an island of tranquility — here in Israel,” Ben-Yehuda said.

The community members have also made an effort to integrate into Israeli society by following the Israeli education curriculum in their school, located just outside the compound.

In addition, about 100 community members now serve in the Israeli armed forces.

The community also produces and markets their traditional natural-fabric robes and produce their own brand of gospel-style music, which has been performed both locally and internationally.

“We have really outgrown the area where we live in today,” Ben-Yehuda said.

(Reporting by Avida Landau; editing by Jeffrey Heller and Sara Ledwith)

© Reuters 2007. All Rights Reserved.

“BLACK HEBREWS’ GETTING KIBBUTZ” NOV.2007 FROM KINGDOM-NEWS-NET.BLOGSPOT.COM

December 16, 2007

from kingdom-news-net.blogspot.com

‘Black Hebrews’ getting kibbutz
The move will be another milestone for the Black Hebrews
JTA News AgencyIsrael’s “Black Hebrews” are getting their own kibbutz.
Dimona Mayor Meir Cohen, whose cramped Negev town has been home to the so-called Black Hebrews since their founders emigrated from the United States in the 1960s, announced this week that the community had been allotted a tract of nearby desert land on which to found a kibbutz.
The move will be another milestone in the Black Hebrews’ efforts to be recognized by the Jewish state.
Identifying itself as “African Hebrew Israelite,” the 3,000-member community claims descent from the Ten Lost Jewish Tribes, but this has long been rejected by rabbinical authorities as baseless.
The Black Hebrews are strict vegans and polygamists, and they practice some Jewish rites. They said their kibbutz will feature tourist attractions like a health spa and restaurant.
posted by knn-keymah @ 6:25 AM

4 Comments:
At 8:17 PM , Inquirer said…

Why a veggan diet?

Yahshuah was a meat eater (like me) as shown in New Testament, Luke 24:41-43.

He drank wine and the Apostles determined that all comestibles given in the Holy Name were acceptable and were to be received with gratitude.

I accept your congregation’s belief in polygyny but not vegetarianism as there is no biblical basis for it.

Respectfully yours ……

At 6:13 PM , Prinzess Yohann said…

I don’t get the first commentator!How could you not get vegetarianism,but get polygamy, it does not add up.And to what standing do you get polygamy? Carnally or Perceptionally?Cause if carnally then I would overstand why you get polygamy and not vegetarian( any thing you think has to do with “flesh” you get). Does not the animals you eat have life? Did not Yahweh allow the flesh of an animal to be eating after the flood when all vegetation was destroyed? And now that vegetation is alive and well(if not chemicalized)don’t you think we should return to the original meal plan?

At 2:21 PM , Inquirer said…

Reply to the prinzess,

First you have a beautiful name.

Second, I specifically agreed that polygyny is acceptable — NOT polygamy which is the practice of having multiple spouses.

The Bible specifically allows 7 women to propose marriage to a man all at once as per Isaiah 4:1. Each woman comes with her own dowry and means of support. In the New Testament, Yahshuah did not ever address polygyny or concubinage where a man is allowed to have an unlimited amount of secondary wives. If the Messiah wished to ban these practices He would have said so. But He never addressed these issues and said that He affirmed Mosiac Law!!

Therefore, Mosaic Law subject to certain alterations made under messianic Law are allowed to stand. On that basis, polygyny, concubinage, and meat eating are permissable.

I await proof from anyone that the Bible teaches anything that would refute what I have just written.

Eternal Blessings to all …

At 10:30 AM , Azaniyah said…

Why not a vegan diet?
You said it yourself, the apostles determined that all foods given in the Holy Name were acceptable. Although the decision was incorrect ,they reached a determination.
If we all are aware of the damage to our bodies caused by eating flesh, (clogged arteries, hypertension, stroke , migraines, colon cancer and the likes thereof) should we continue to slowly kill ourselves by eating flesh.
Deu 30:19 I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that I have set before thee life and death, the blessing and the curse; therefore choose life, that thou mayest live, thou and thy seed;
Knowing the benefits of maintaining a vegan diet why would you choose a slow death instead of a long life. The scripture don’t teach common sense but it offers some clues,

Previous Posts
Food for thought
Bangladesh cyclone toll rises
KNN Exclusive-Africans in America: Why are we stil…
Poll: Blacks grow more pessimistic
Income gap widens between black, white families
Cleveland’s Sis. Yaheli is Kick-in it “Live”
Prince Asiel – A Portrait of a Living Hero
Soul Vegetarian – World’s Largest Vegan Restaurant…
African Hebrews sink roots deeper into Holy Land
The Mississippi Extension Has Greens Galore!!!!

Protected: MARTIN ROBINSON DELANY AND EDWARD WILMOT BLYDEN:RACE MEN AND PIONEER BLACK NATIONALISTS” BY BROTHER RUNOKO RASHIDI AT SAXAKALI.COM

December 16, 2007

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

THE SUMERIANS AND OTHERS IN THE “NEAR EAST” WERE BLACK! FROM EGYPTSEARCH.COM

December 5, 2007

from egyptsearch.com

CLICK ON AND SEE GREAT PICTURES OF BLACKS!

Author Topic: Africa, Semites, and the “Near East”
Neith-Athena
Member
Member # 10040

Rate Member posted 28 November, 2007 05:08 PM
——————————————————————————–
I have broached this topic before, but would like to do so more fully now. Are there any languages besides the Elamites’ (probably related to Dravidian) or the Sumerians’ (a language isolate” in the “Near East” that are not Semitic? Did total linguistic replacement take place? Would the linguistic evidence, the archaeological and anthropological, and the genetic evidence not lead scholars to admit the pivotal role of Africans (not to dismiss the contributions of others) to the development of the “Near East”? Any responses would be appreciated.

Thanks.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 102 | From: USA | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 28 November, 2007 09:25 PM
——————————————————————————–
Yes. The thing you have to understand is that the Sumerian, Elamite and Dravidian languages are related. Not only are they related to one another they are also related to the Niger Congo languages especially : Mande, and Wolof.

The original inhabitants of South and West Asia were the Anu people. A catastrophe took place and many of the Anu centers of civilization outside the Nile Valley were destroyed.

The Sumerians were negroes , just like Africans.

Sumerian King Gudea

. [/qb]

Between 3500 and 2500 BC Kushite people from the Saharan highlands speaking Sumerian began to occupy Mesopotamia. Around the same time these Kushites entered Mesopotamia, the contemporary Syrian types began to migrate from the mountain areas into the valley areas settled by Sumerians. These mauranding nomads were called Gutians.

Gutians

In the history text these Gutians are protrayed as Sumerians. In reality the Gutian leaders of Lagash are not mentioned in any of the Sumerian King list.

.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 28 November, 2007 09:30 PM
——————————————————————————–
The Sumerians were differentiating themselves from the Gutians.

Gutian ….. Sumerian

Gutian

Sumerian King Gudea

Note the different handshake of the Sumerian and the Gutians. Much of the art published relating to Sumerians, are often pictures of the Gutians when they ruled Lagash.

No Gutian kings of Lagash are mentioned in the Sumerian King List.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

Mystery Solver
Member
Member # 9033

posted 28 November, 2007 10:09 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Neith-Athena:

I have broached this topic before, but would like to do so more fully now. Are there any languages besides the Elamites’ (probably related to Dravidian) or the Sumerians’ (a language isolate” in the “Near East” that are not Semitic?
——————————————————————————–

Scanty evidence of writing that can be traced back further in time than the dates approximated for the above mentioned groups, makes it difficult to determine how many more different languages may have been spoken in the region, besides or prior to the predominance of Semitic speaking groups in the region as seen today. It has even been suggested that…

perhaps there is an initial influence of Egyptian writing on Mesopotamia because there are signs on Mesopotamian objects that are only “readable” from the standpoint of the Egyptian language, but not the Mesopotamian language..

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Neith-Athena:

Did total linguistic replacement take place?
——————————————————————————–

It is safe to assume that prior to the movement of proto-Afrasan groups into the region, that this region would have had groups which spoke non-Afrasan languages. Over time, some languages eventually died out, while new ones developed from pre-existing branches. Given this, even if it is said that Afrasan languages didn’t ‘totally’ replace any pre-existing languages, it can be safely said that Afrasan languages largely replaced them.

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Neith-Athena:

Would the linguistic evidence, the archaeological and anthropological, and the genetic evidence not lead scholars to admit the pivotal role of Africans (not to dismiss the contributions of others) to the development of the “Near East”? Any responses would be appreciated.
——————————————————————————–

Already has. See above; almost the entire “Near Eastern” region from the Levant onwards is dominated by Afrasan languages. Upper Paleolithic and/or early Neolithic expanded PN2-derived lineages have virtually become markers for the spread of the farming economy. “Neolithic” era crania in the Levant have been characterized as a composite of distinctive modal patterns, certain aspects of which suggest strong affinities with specimens from the Upper Nile Valley. Certain new lithic [hence “Neolithic”] tools dated to a time frame prior to the “Neolithic agriculture” economy of the Levant, have been linked back to north Africa.

Related discussion amongst the many: Neolithic farmers, early semitic and Mesopotamia
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 1622 | Registered: Sep 2005 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 28 November, 2007 10:10 PM
——————————————————————————–
History as written today is nothing but falsehood. For example, here is a Sumerian:

But instead of showing Sumerians in textbooks scholars provide pictures of Gutians from Lagash:

Without the concept of race the lie being taught that the Sumerians were non-Blacks–Gutians– will exist forever, since text book publishers only publish what they want us to believe.You can continue to follow the Eurocentrists propaganda that erases Blacks from ancient history–I would rather stick to reality.

.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

rasol
Member
Member # 4592

posted 28 November, 2007 10:41 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Without the concept of race the lie being taught that the Sumerians were non-Blacks–Gutians– will exist forever, since text book publishers only publish what they want us to believe.
——————————————————————————–

I agree 100% that the Sumerians are misrepresented.

Indeed, the concept of race, which is itself a misrepresentation of biology is in part culpable for this misrepresentation, and never has been and never will be able to provide resolution.

Race in anthropology is a dead end debate, and you actually illustate this with your photos.

Advocates of race, can and will argue that this statue is caucasian, while you counter argue that is negro.

Such and argument has never progressed beyound shouting across a table.

This is one reason why most anthropologist no longer attempt to ascribe pseudo-scientific race classifications to ancient populations.

Race, in anthropology, is fatally flawed concept, it is percieved as -necessary- only for those whose thinking caged by European racists of the 17th century, who provided a world view, that some misguided Africanist scholars are still -reacting- to with racialist -counter myths-.

Modern African scholars are pursuing a revolutionary [as opposed to reactionary] discourse, which rethinks human history in terms that moot the old-dead-end race arguments.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 11664 | Registered: Jun 2004 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 28 November, 2007 10:45 PM
——————————————————————————–
The languages spoken in ancient Mesopotamia and the Levant have changed overtime. The first people to dominate the area were the Sumerians. The language spoken by the Sumerians was adopted by the nomadic people living in the area, especially the Gutians.

Akkadian

The Sumerians were conquered by the Akkadians the Akkadians spoke a Semitic language. The linguistic evidence makes it clear that the Akkadians originated in the Sudan,migrated across East Africa into Arabia and replaced the Sumerians as the dominate group in Mesopotamia. The Gutians, once the Akkadians took over the region replaced Sumerian with the Semitic language spoken by the Akkadians. Since Akkadian times Semitic has been the dominate language in Mesopotamia.

Anoth group of Semitic speakers settled the Levant.These people were a great naval power called the Cananites and Phonesians.

The linguistic evidence makes it clear that the Akkadians originated in Africa.

According to Haupt, in 1878, Akkadian , Minaean
and Ethiopic all belong to the same group of Semitic
languages, even though they are separated in time and
by great geographical distance. This is surprising
considering the fact that Ethiopic and Akkadian are
separated by many hundreds of years. The best example
of this unity is the presence of shared archaicism
. The linguistic feature of shared
archaicism is the appearance of the vowel after the
first consonant of the imperfect.

For example, one of the most outstanding features
of Ethiopian Semitic languages, is the presence of a vowel following the
first consonant in the verb form known as the
imperfect, e.g., yi quattul (using the hypothetical
verb consonants q-t-l, yi is the person marking
prefix) or yi k’ettl ‘he kills’. In Southwest Semitic
the form of the perfect is yu qtul-u . Here we have
the same hypothetical q-t-l form, but there is no
vowel following the first consonant of the verb root.

It is common in non-African languages to form words with two consonants. African languages usually have a vowel separting each consonant in a word e.g., unasema kiswahilli “Can you speak Swahilli’.

The fact that Akkadian has shared archaicism with Ethiopian Semitic
languages shows that at the time the
Akkadians and Ethiopic speakers separated these groups
had dialectical unity. The lack of this trait in
Arabic and Hebrew shows that they have been influenced
by the Indo-European speakers who invaded Palestine
and Arabia between 1300 B.C. and 900 B.C.

Semitic verb root

code:
——————————————————————————–

Akkadian Ethiopic/S.Arabiankl ‘to be dark’ ekelu Soqotri okil ‘to cover’mr ‘to see’ amaru Geez ammara;Tigre amarabr ‘to catch’ baru Soqotri b’rdgh ‘remove’ daqu Geez dagba ‘to perforate’kdn ‘to protect’ kidin Tigre kadna

——————————————————————————–

I call the Semitic languages , Puntite languages since there homeland was probably in the region the Egyptians called Punt.

The Cushitic substratum has strongly influenced
the phonology, morphology, syntax and vocabulary of
the Puntite languages.

code:
——————————————————————————–

Cushitic English SemiticSaho la wild cow *la-atSomali la id. id.

——————————————————————————–

This supports the view of I.M. Diakonoff that the
Semitic speakers and A-Group lived in close proximity
in ancient times. Archaeological evidence also supports this reality. A common ceramic style associated with ancient cultures in Northeast Africa and Arabia is the Tihama culture.

The Tihama pottery was related to the C-Group and Kerma people. This supports the movement of some of these groups into the Horn from this region and explains why the Akkadian and Ethiopic are closely related.

The evidence discussed above makes
it clear that Arabia, was probably not the original
homeland of the Semitic speakers. Modern Ethiopians and the Akkadians
originated in Africa, not Arabia.

Find out more about the Tihama culture here

Fattowich web page
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

rasol
Member
Member # 4592

posted 28 November, 2007 10:52 PM
——————————————————————————–
^ Very interesting. Good post.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 11664 | Registered: Jun 2004 | IP: Logged |

Mystery Solver
Member
Member # 9033

posted 28 November, 2007 11:04 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

The first people to dominate the area were the Sumerians.
——————————————————————————–

Would depend on time frame. For instance, who was dominant in the area during the “Natufian” inhabitation there?
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 1622 | Registered: Sep 2005 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 28 November, 2007 11:12 PM
——————————————————————————–
Rasol

I wish we could separate the history of the Middle East from race, but it is impossible to do so because of the desire of Eurocentrists to make Semitic speakers members of the “white” race.

The controversy surrounding the Kushite/African/Black origins of the Elamites, Sumerians, Akkadians and “Assyrians” is simple and yet complicated. It involves both the racism exhibited toward the African slaves in the Western Hemisphere and Africans generally which led to the idea that Africans had no history ; and the need of Julius Oppert to make Semites white, to accommodate the “white” ancestry of European Jews.

To understand this dichotomy we have to look at the history of scholarship surrounding the rise of Sumero-Akkadian studies. The study of the Sumerians, Akkadians. Assyrians and Elamites began with the decipherment of the cuneiform script by Henry Rawlinson. Henry Rawlinson had spent most of his career in the Orient. This appears to have gave him an open mind in regards to history. He recognized the Ancient Model of History, the idea that civilization was founded by the Kushite or Hamitic people of the Bible.

As result, Rawlinson was surprised during his research to discover that the founders of the Mesopotamian civilization were of Kushite origin. He made it clear that the Semitic speakers of Akkad and the non-Semitic speakers of Sumer were both Black or Negro people who called themselves sag-gig-ga “Black Heads”. In Rawlinson’s day the Sumerian people were recognized as Akkadian or Chaldean, while the Semitic speaking blacks were called Assyrians.

Rawlinson identified these Akkadians as Turanian or Scythic people. But he made it clear that these ancient Scythic or Turanian speaking people were Kushites or Blacks.

A major supporter of Rawlinson was Edward Hincks. Hincks continued Rawlinson’s work and identified the ancient group as Chaldeans, and also called them Turanian speakers. Hincks, though, never dicussed their ethnic origin.

A late comer to the study of the Sumerians and the Akkadians was Julius Oppert. Oppert was a German born of Jewish parents. He made it clear that the Chaldean and Akkadian people spoke different languages. He noted that the original founders of Mesopotamia civilization called themselves Ki-en-gi “land of the true lords”. It was the Semitic speakers who called themselves Akkadians.

Assyrians called the Ki-en-gi people Sumiritu “the sacred language”. Oppert popularized the Assyrian name Sumer, for the original founders of the civilization. Thus we have today the Akkadians and Sumerians of ancient Mesopotamia.

Oppert began to popularize the idea that the Sumerians were related to the contemporary Altaic and Turanian speaking people, e.g., Turks and Magyar (Hungarian) speaking people. He made it clear that the Akkadians were Semites like himself . To support this idea Oppert pointed out that typological features between Sumerian and Altaic languages existed. This feature was agglutination.

The problem with identifying the Sumerians as descendants from contemporary Turanian speakers resulted from the fact that Sumerian and the Turkish languages are not genetically related. As a result Oppert began to criticize the work of Hincks (who was dead at the time) in relation to the identification of the Sumerian people as Turanian following the research of Rawlinson.

It is strange to some observers that Oppert,never criticized Rawlinson who had proposed the Turanian origin of the Ki-en-gi (Sumerians). But this was not strange at all. Oppert did not attack Rawlinson who was still alive at the time because he knew that Rawlinson said the Sumerians were the original Scythic and Turanian people he called Kushites. Moreover, Rawlinson made it clear that both the Akkadians and Sumerians were Blacks. For Oppert to have debated this issue with Rawlinson, who deciphered the cuneiform script, would have meant that he would have had to accept the fact that Semites were Black. There was no way Oppert would have wanted to acknowledge his African heritage, given the Anti-Semitism experienced by Jews living in Europe.

Although Oppert successfully hid the recognition that the Akkadians and the Sumerians both refered to themselves as sag-gig-ga “black heads”, some researchers were unable to follow the status quo and ignore this reality. For example, Francois Lenormant, made it clear, following the research of Rawlinson, that the Elamite and Sumerians spoke genetically related languages. This idea was hard to reconcile with the depiction of people on the monuments of Iran, especially the Behistun monument, which depicted Negroes (with curly hair and beards) representing the Assyrians, Jews and Elamites who ruled the area. As a result, Oppert began the myth that the Sumerian languages was isolated from other languages spoken in the world evethough it shared typological features with the Altaic languages. Oppert taught Akkadian-Sumerian in many of the leading Universities in France and Germany. Many of his students soon began to dominate the Academe, or held chairs in Sumerian and Akkadian studies these researchers continued to perpetuate the myth that the Elamite and Sumerian languages were not related.

There was no way to keep from researchers who read the original Sumerian, Akkadian and Assyrian text that these people recognized that they were ethnically Blacks. This fact was made clear by Albert Terrien de LaCouperie. Born in France, de LaCouperie was a well known linguist and China expert. Although native of France most of his writings are in English. In the journal he published called the Babylonian and Oriental Record, he outlined many aspects of ancient history. In these pages he made it clear that the Sumerians, Akkadians and even the Assyrians who called themselves şalmat kakkadi ‘black headed people”, were all Blacks of Kushite origin. Eventhough de LaCouperie taught at the University of London, the prestige of Oppert, and the fact that the main centers for Sumero-Akkadian studies in France and Germany were founded by Oppert and or his students led to researchers ignoring the evidence that the Sumerians , Akkadians and Assyrians were Black.

In summary, the cuneiform evidence makes it clear that the Sumerians, Akkadians and Assyrians recognized themselves as Negroes: “black heads”. This fact was supported by the statues of Gudea, the Akkadians and Assyrians. Plus the Behistun monument made it clear that the Elamites were also Blacks.

The textual evidence also makes it clear that Oppert began the discussion of a typological relationship between Sumerian and Turkic languages. He also manufactured the idea that the Semites of Mesopotamia and Iran, the Assyrians and Akkadians were “whites”, like himself. Due to this brain washing, and whitening out of Blacks in history, many people today can look at depictions of Assyrians, Achamenians, and Akkadians and fail to see the Negro origin of these people.

To make the Sumerians “white” textbooks print pictures of artifacts dating to the Gutian rule of Lagash, to pass them off as the true originators of Sumerian civilization. No Gutian rulers of Lagash are recognized in the Sumerian King List.

.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 28 November, 2007 11:26 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Mystery Solver:

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

The first people to dominate the area were the Sumerians.
——————————————————————————–

Would depend on time frame. For instance, who was dominant in the area during the “Natufian” inhabitation there?
——————————————————————————–

The founders of civilization in South West Asia were the Anu people, archaeologists call Natufians. By 13,000 BC, according to J.D. Clark (“The origins of domestication in Ethiopia”, Fifth Panafrican Congress of prehistory and quaternary Studies, Nairobi,1977) the Natufians were collecting grasses which later became domesticated crops in Southwest Asia.

In Palestine the Natufians established intensive grass collection. The Natufians used the Ibero-Maurusian tool industry (see F. Wendorf, The
History of Nubia, Dallas,1968, pp.941-46). These
Natufians , according to Christopher Ehret ( “On the antiquity of agriculture in Ethiopia”, Jour. of African History 20, [1979], p.161) were small stature folk who spread agriculture throughout Nubia into the Red Sea. The Natufians took the Ibero-Maurusian tools into Europe, North Africa and the Middle East.

The Natufians practiced evulsion of the incisors the same as Bantu people and inhabitants of the Saharan fringes. At this early date the Bantu were probably still in the Saharan highlands along with other Niger-Congo, Cushitic and etc., contemporary African groups. There are traditions among these people that when they settled much Africa, most regions were already occupied by small blacks probably San and/or Khoisan.

I believe that the Natufians given the craniometric evidence for this group probably were San and/or Khoisan . Up to today many Khoisan people live in East Africa, the origination point for the Natufian people. I would guess that the Natufians spoke a Khoisan language.

.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

Mystery Solver
Member
Member # 9033

posted 29 November, 2007 12:02 AM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Mystery Solver:

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

The first people to dominate the area were the Sumerians.
——————————————————————————–

Would depend on time frame. For instance, who was dominant in the area during the “Natufian” inhabitation there?
——————————————————————————–

The founders of civilization in South West Asia were the Anu people, archaeologists call Natufians.
——————————————————————————–

You know this because…?

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

In Palestine the Natufians established intensive grass collection. The Natufians used the Ibero-Maurusian tool industry (see F. Wendorf, The
History of Nubia, Dallas,1968, pp.941-46).
——————————————————————————–

What do you think of as “Ibero-Maurusian”? Why that designation, when we are dealing with new microlithic tools originating in mainland Africa and transferred into the Levant via the Nile Valley?

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

I believe that the Natufians given the craniometric evidence for this group probably were San and/or Khoisan .
——————————————————————————–

What cranio-metric evidence has led you to that conclusion?

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

Up to today many Khoisan people live in East Africa, the origination point for the Natufian people. I would guess that the Natufians spoke a Khoisan language.
——————————————————————————–

No Khoisan language is known to occur in the “Near East”, but Afrasan languages do predominate in that region from the Levant downwards. What markers linguitics-wise and genetics-wise, would help us learn about this close Natufian-Khoisan linkage you speak of?
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 1622 | Registered: Sep 2005 | IP: Logged |

Doug M
Member
Member # 7650

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 04:43 AM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
Rasol

I wish we could separate the history of the Middle East from race, but it is impossible to do so because of the desire of Eurocentrists to make Semitic speakers members of the “white” race.

The controversy surrounding the Kushite/African/Black origins of the Elamites, Sumerians, Akkadians and “Assyrians” is simple and yet complicated. It involves both the racism exhibited toward the African slaves in the Western Hemisphere and Africans generally which led to the idea that Africans had no history ; and the need of Julius Oppert to make Semites white, to accommodate the “white” ancestry of European Jews.

To understand this dichotomy we have to look at the history of scholarship surrounding the rise of Sumero-Akkadian studies. The study of the Sumerians, Akkadians. Assyrians and Elamites began with the decipherment of the cuneiform script by Henry Rawlinson. Henry Rawlinson had spent most of his career in the Orient. This appears to have gave him an open mind in regards to history. He recognized the Ancient Model of History, the idea that civilization was founded by the Kushite or Hamitic people of the Bible.

As result, Rawlinson was surprised during his research to discover that the founders of the Mesopotamian civilization were of Kushite origin. He made it clear that the Semitic speakers of Akkad and the non-Semitic speakers of Sumer were both Black or Negro people who called themselves sag-gig-ga “Black Heads”. In Rawlinson’s day the Sumerian people were recognized as Akkadian or Chaldean, while the Semitic speaking blacks were called Assyrians.

Rawlinson identified these Akkadians as Turanian or Scythic people. But he made it clear that these ancient Scythic or Turanian speaking people were Kushites or Blacks.

A major supporter of Rawlinson was Edward Hincks. Hincks continued Rawlinson’s work and identified the ancient group as Chaldeans, and also called them Turanian speakers. Hincks, though, never dicussed their ethnic origin.

A late comer to the study of the Sumerians and the Akkadians was Julius Oppert. Oppert was a German born of Jewish parents. He made it clear that the Chaldean and Akkadian people spoke different languages. He noted that the original founders of Mesopotamia civilization called themselves Ki-en-gi “land of the true lords”. It was the Semitic speakers who called themselves Akkadians.

Assyrians called the Ki-en-gi people Sumiritu “the sacred language”. Oppert popularized the Assyrian name Sumer, for the original founders of the civilization. Thus we have today the Akkadians and Sumerians of ancient Mesopotamia.

Oppert began to popularize the idea that the Sumerians were related to the contemporary Altaic and Turanian speaking people, e.g., Turks and Magyar (Hungarian) speaking people. He made it clear that the Akkadians were Semites like himself . To support this idea Oppert pointed out that typological features between Sumerian and Altaic languages existed. This feature was agglutination.

The problem with identifying the Sumerians as descendants from contemporary Turanian speakers resulted from the fact that Sumerian and the Turkish languages are not genetically related. As a result Oppert began to criticize the work of Hincks (who was dead at the time) in relation to the identification of the Sumerian people as Turanian following the research of Rawlinson.

It is strange to some observers that Oppert,never criticized Rawlinson who had proposed the Turanian origin of the Ki-en-gi (Sumerians). But this was not strange at all. Oppert did not attack Rawlinson who was still alive at the time because he knew that Rawlinson said the Sumerians were the original Scythic and Turanian people he called Kushites. Moreover, Rawlinson made it clear that both the Akkadians and Sumerians were Blacks. For Oppert to have debated this issue with Rawlinson, who deciphered the cuneiform script, would have meant that he would have had to accept the fact that Semites were Black. There was no way Oppert would have wanted to acknowledge his African heritage, given the Anti-Semitism experienced by Jews living in Europe.

Although Oppert successfully hid the recognition that the Akkadians and the Sumerians both refered to themselves as sag-gig-ga “black heads”, some researchers were unable to follow the status quo and ignore this reality. For example, Francois Lenormant, made it clear, following the research of Rawlinson, that the Elamite and Sumerians spoke genetically related languages. This idea was hard to reconcile with the depiction of people on the monuments of Iran, especially the Behistun monument, which depicted Negroes (with curly hair and beards) representing the Assyrians, Jews and Elamites who ruled the area. As a result, Oppert began the myth that the Sumerian languages was isolated from other languages spoken in the world evethough it shared typological features with the Altaic languages. Oppert taught Akkadian-Sumerian in many of the leading Universities in France and Germany. Many of his students soon began to dominate the Academe, or held chairs in Sumerian and Akkadian studies these researchers continued to perpetuate the myth that the Elamite and Sumerian languages were not related.

There was no way to keep from researchers who read the original Sumerian, Akkadian and Assyrian text that these people recognized that they were ethnically Blacks. This fact was made clear by Albert Terrien de LaCouperie. Born in France, de LaCouperie was a well known linguist and China expert. Although native of France most of his writings are in English. In the journal he published called the Babylonian and Oriental Record, he outlined many aspects of ancient history. In these pages he made it clear that the Sumerians, Akkadians and even the Assyrians who called themselves şalmat kakkadi ‘black headed people”, were all Blacks of Kushite origin. Eventhough de LaCouperie taught at the University of London, the prestige of Oppert, and the fact that the main centers for Sumero-Akkadian studies in France and Germany were founded by Oppert and or his students led to researchers ignoring the evidence that the Sumerians , Akkadians and Assyrians were Black.

In summary, the cuneiform evidence makes it clear that the Sumerians, Akkadians and Assyrians recognized themselves as Negroes: “black heads”. This fact was supported by the statues of Gudea, the Akkadians and Assyrians. Plus the Behistun monument made it clear that the Elamites were also Blacks.

The textual evidence also makes it clear that Oppert began the discussion of a typological relationship between Sumerian and Turkic languages. He also manufactured the idea that the Semites of Mesopotamia and Iran, the Assyrians and Akkadians were “whites”, like himself. Due to this brain washing, and whitening out of Blacks in history, many people today can look at depictions of Assyrians, Achamenians, and Akkadians and fail to see the Negro origin of these people.

To make the Sumerians “white” textbooks print pictures of artifacts dating to the Gutian rule of Lagash, to pass them off as the true originators of Sumerian civilization. No Gutian rulers of Lagash are recognized in the Sumerian King List.

.
——————————————————————————–

Please provide citations from Rawlins, et al that says these people were “blacks”. Please provide citations from the Behistun monument that “clearly” shows that these people identified themselves as blacks or from Africa. I don’t see anything that supports what you are saying.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2434 | Registered: May 2005 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 09:12 AM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Doug M:

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
Rasol

I wish we could separate the history of the Middle East from race, but it is impossible to do so because of the desire of Eurocentrists to make Semitic speakers members of the “white” race.

The controversy surrounding the Kushite/African/Black origins of the Elamites, Sumerians, Akkadians and “Assyrians” is simple and yet complicated. It involves both the racism exhibited toward the African slaves in the Western Hemisphere and Africans generally which led to the idea that Africans had no history ; and the need of Julius Oppert to make Semites white, to accommodate the “white” ancestry of European Jews.

To understand this dichotomy we have to look at the history of scholarship surrounding the rise of Sumero-Akkadian studies. The study of the Sumerians, Akkadians. Assyrians and Elamites began with the decipherment of the cuneiform script by Henry Rawlinson. Henry Rawlinson had spent most of his career in the Orient. This appears to have gave him an open mind in regards to history. He recognized the Ancient Model of History, the idea that civilization was founded by the Kushite or Hamitic people of the Bible.

As result, Rawlinson was surprised during his research to discover that the founders of the Mesopotamian civilization were of Kushite origin. He made it clear that the Semitic speakers of Akkad and the non-Semitic speakers of Sumer were both Black or Negro people who called themselves sag-gig-ga “Black Heads”. In Rawlinson’s day the Sumerian people were recognized as Akkadian or Chaldean, while the Semitic speaking blacks were called Assyrians.

Rawlinson identified these Akkadians as Turanian or Scythic people. But he made it clear that these ancient Scythic or Turanian speaking people were Kushites or Blacks.

A major supporter of Rawlinson was Edward Hincks. Hincks continued Rawlinson’s work and identified the ancient group as Chaldeans, and also called them Turanian speakers. Hincks, though, never dicussed their ethnic origin.

A late comer to the study of the Sumerians and the Akkadians was Julius Oppert. Oppert was a German born of Jewish parents. He made it clear that the Chaldean and Akkadian people spoke different languages. He noted that the original founders of Mesopotamia civilization called themselves Ki-en-gi “land of the true lords”. It was the Semitic speakers who called themselves Akkadians.

Assyrians called the Ki-en-gi people Sumiritu “the sacred language”. Oppert popularized the Assyrian name Sumer, for the original founders of the civilization. Thus we have today the Akkadians and Sumerians of ancient Mesopotamia.

Oppert began to popularize the idea that the Sumerians were related to the contemporary Altaic and Turanian speaking people, e.g., Turks and Magyar (Hungarian) speaking people. He made it clear that the Akkadians were Semites like himself . To support this idea Oppert pointed out that typological features between Sumerian and Altaic languages existed. This feature was agglutination.

The problem with identifying the Sumerians as descendants from contemporary Turanian speakers resulted from the fact that Sumerian and the Turkish languages are not genetically related. As a result Oppert began to criticize the work of Hincks (who was dead at the time) in relation to the identification of the Sumerian people as Turanian following the research of Rawlinson.

It is strange to some observers that Oppert,never criticized Rawlinson who had proposed the Turanian origin of the Ki-en-gi (Sumerians). But this was not strange at all. Oppert did not attack Rawlinson who was still alive at the time because he knew that Rawlinson said the Sumerians were the original Scythic and Turanian people he called Kushites. Moreover, Rawlinson made it clear that both the Akkadians and Sumerians were Blacks. For Oppert to have debated this issue with Rawlinson, who deciphered the cuneiform script, would have meant that he would have had to accept the fact that Semites were Black. There was no way Oppert would have wanted to acknowledge his African heritage, given the Anti-Semitism experienced by Jews living in Europe.

Although Oppert successfully hid the recognition that the Akkadians and the Sumerians both refered to themselves as sag-gig-ga “black heads”, some researchers were unable to follow the status quo and ignore this reality. For example, Francois Lenormant, made it clear, following the research of Rawlinson, that the Elamite and Sumerians spoke genetically related languages. This idea was hard to reconcile with the depiction of people on the monuments of Iran, especially the Behistun monument, which depicted Negroes (with curly hair and beards) representing the Assyrians, Jews and Elamites who ruled the area. As a result, Oppert began the myth that the Sumerian languages was isolated from other languages spoken in the world evethough it shared typological features with the Altaic languages. Oppert taught Akkadian-Sumerian in many of the leading Universities in France and Germany. Many of his students soon began to dominate the Academe, or held chairs in Sumerian and Akkadian studies these researchers continued to perpetuate the myth that the Elamite and Sumerian languages were not related.

There was no way to keep from researchers who read the original Sumerian, Akkadian and Assyrian text that these people recognized that they were ethnically Blacks. This fact was made clear by Albert Terrien de LaCouperie. Born in France, de LaCouperie was a well known linguist and China expert. Although native of France most of his writings are in English. In the journal he published called the Babylonian and Oriental Record, he outlined many aspects of ancient history. In these pages he made it clear that the Sumerians, Akkadians and even the Assyrians who called themselves şalmat kakkadi ‘black headed people”, were all Blacks of Kushite origin. Eventhough de LaCouperie taught at the University of London, the prestige of Oppert, and the fact that the main centers for Sumero-Akkadian studies in France and Germany were founded by Oppert and or his students led to researchers ignoring the evidence that the Sumerians , Akkadians and Assyrians were Black.

In summary, the cuneiform evidence makes it clear that the Sumerians, Akkadians and Assyrians recognized themselves as Negroes: “black heads”. This fact was supported by the statues of Gudea, the Akkadians and Assyrians. Plus the Behistun monument made it clear that the Elamites were also Blacks.

The textual evidence also makes it clear that Oppert began the discussion of a typological relationship between Sumerian and Turkic languages. He also manufactured the idea that the Semites of Mesopotamia and Iran, the Assyrians and Akkadians were “whites”, like himself. Due to this brain washing, and whitening out of Blacks in history, many people today can look at depictions of Assyrians, Achamenians, and Akkadians and fail to see the Negro origin of these people.

To make the Sumerians “white” textbooks print pictures of artifacts dating to the Gutian rule of Lagash, to pass them off as the true originators of Sumerian civilization. No Gutian rulers of Lagash are recognized in the Sumerian King List.

.
——————————————————————————–

Please provide citations from Rawlins, et al that says these people were “blacks”. Please provide citations from the Behistun monument that “clearly” shows that these people identified themselves as blacks or from Africa. I don’t see anything that supports what you are saying.
——————————————————————————–

Of course you wouldn’t understand anything I am saying you believe that the only Africans to influence history lived in Egypt. But other scholars know the truth.

Col. Rawlinson the decipherer of the cuneiform writing makes it clear that the ancient Turanians were the“Hamitic Nations” mentioned in the Bible: Kush (Cush), Misraim (Egypt), Nimrud ( Sumerians and Elamites) and Canaan (Phonesians) (see: C.B. Rawlinson, “Notes on
the early history of Babylon”, Jour. Royal Asiatic Society (First Series) 15, p.230. ).

.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

Djehuti
Member
Member # 6698

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 12:29 PM
——————————————————————————–
^ Why is this thread being overrun with Winters fantasies?
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 10492 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005 | IP: Logged |

rasol
Member
Member # 4592

posted 29 November, 2007 12:45 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
Rasol

I wish we could separate the history of the Middle East from race,
——————————————————————————–

We don’t need to separate

-history- of

-middle east- from

-race-

We need to separate

-fact-

from

-fiction-.

For example -> the *middle east* is a fictious historical entity.

It is invented by the British, with the esoteric geopolitical purpose of preventing Iran from claiming the rights to it’s own oil.

It is meant to describe and legitimize a zone of European political influence.

Before the British invented this term in the early 20th century – there is no reference to the *middle east* anywhere in the world.

Nor is there and equivalent term, or conception.

The term is completely non-native, unnatural, and superimosed upon non European people for the primary purposes of sublimating there native identities and interest.

Like the middle east – *race* is also false, and pseudo-scientific construct of Eurocentrists.

Therefore, to speak of the ‘racial history of the middle east’ is to surrender to Eurocentric brainwashing.

It is a discourse rooted in nonsense, and bounded by the constructs of Eurocentric racists.

The consequence of Africanists scholars who repeat this conception is to serve the interest of Eurocentrist.

As long as we remained ‘pinned down’ discussing the world in terms of a Eurocentric ideology of ‘race’ and ‘middle east’, then Eurocentrist prevail because they keep the conversation stalemated.

A stalemate always serves the interest of protectors of the status quo.

Remember this, the next time you claim King Tut is a Negro because he has prognathism, and Eurocentrist laugh and counter that he is a Caucasian because he has a high nasal bridge.

[both features are also found in the statues you posted]

You can’t win and argument in the context of a nonsensical dialectic that was designed -by your opponent- to begin with.

The very act of repeating after their racial dialectic, which is based on their root assumptions, is to be defeated by it.

I actually suspect that you are beginning to see this, Dr. Winters.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 11664 | Registered: Jun 2004 | IP: Logged |

rasol
Member
Member # 4592

posted 29 November, 2007 01:26 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
The controversy surrounding the Kushite/African/Black origins of the Elamites, Sumerians, Akkadians and “Assyrians” is simple and yet complicated. It involves both the racism exhibited toward the African slaves in the Western Hemisphere and Africans generally which led to the idea that Africans had no history ; and the need of Julius Oppert to make Semites white, to accommodate the “white” ancestry of European Jews.
——————————————————————————–

You can shorten this paragraph by saying that the controversy over the identiy of Kemetian, Kushites and Elamites rooted in racism….yes.

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Rawlinson was surprised during his research to discover that the founders of the Mesopotamian civilization were of Kushite origin. He made it clear that the Semitic speakers of Akkad and the non-Semitic speakers of Sumer were both Black or Negro people who called themselves sag-gig-ga “Black Heads”.
——————————————————————————–

I agree that Sumerians, like the Kemetians, referred to themselves as Blacks, that this reference is and always has been *ethnic* in character, and that this fact is so disturbing to Eurocentric racists, that they have gone to laughable lengths to invent alternate *explanations*, which for the most part, they don’t actually believe in, but assert effectively as pro-forma propaganda.

British scholar George Rawlinson is one of the 1st to translation Herodotus Histories correctly, in which Herodotus repeatedly refers to Egyptians, Ethiopians and others as Blacks.

EX:

– Still the Egyptians said that they believed the Colchians to be descended from the army of Sesostris. My own conjectures were founded, first, on the fact that they are black-skinned and have woolly hair

— Two black doves flew away from Egyptian Thebes, and while one directed its flight to Libya, the other came to them.

By calling the dove black the Dodonaeans indicated that the woman was an Egyptian.

http://www.piney.com/Heredotus2.html

It is interesting to observe in action – Eurocentrism at it’s most desparate and dissembling, tactics have included

– Deny use of the term ‘black’ to describe the Egyptians, and -blame- ‘afrocentric’ misreading – when in fact the early English language translations of Herodotus by Rawlinson and others *all* correctly translated Herodotus as saying such.

— Admit the use of the term black [thus contradicting the former denial], but claim that it doesn’t actually reference Egyptians, but rather Nubians.

Ex:
Herodotus believed this because the *Colchians were black skinned and woolly haired.*

For starters,Herodotus makes no claim that all of the Egyptians had these features and secondly black Nubian mercenaries served in the Egyptian army which would include Pharaoh Sesostris’s army.
https://yeyeolade.wordpress.com/category/black-is-beautiful/

^ This is a beautiful bit of dissembing.

It accuses others of misreading Herodotus, then puts words in Herodotus mouth [Nubians?] he never spoke, in order to evade what he actually said.

It ignores the fact that Herodotus is citing Black skin and Woolly hair as a *common feature* of Ethiopians, Egyptians and Colchians.

After all – he acribes Colchian and -Egyptian- origin, due to black skin and woolly hair -> not and Ethiopian origin due to *nubians* in Egyptian army.

It engages in the straw man argument that Herodotus did not state that *all* Egyptians or *all* Colchoi had these features. [he doesn’t say *all* Ethiopians had them, for that matter].

Of course what is relevant is that Blackness is cited by Herodotus as a common denominator and defining characteristic of all 3 groups, which is of course, exactly what is at issue!

So yes, Eurocentrists are desparate liars, and….they know this.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 11664 | Registered: Jun 2004 | IP: Logged |

rasol
Member
Member # 4592

posted 29 November, 2007 01:34 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
What do you think of as “Ibero-Maurusian”? Why that designation, when we are dealing with new microlithic tools originating in mainland Africa and transferred into the Levant via the Nile Valley?
——————————————————————————–

^ As with Dr. Winters use of Cro-Magnon, it shows residual reliance on musty Eurocentric bogusness.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 11664 | Registered: Jun 2004 | IP: Logged |

Yonis2
Member
Member # 11348

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 02:17 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
rasol wrote:
For example -> the *middle east* is a fictious historical entity
——————————————————————————–

Couldn’t the same be said about Europe? I never see you say “Europe” is a fictious historical entity, why is that since you even acknowledge “European people” in the above post?
At the end of the day all these terms, middle east, europe, southeast asia etc are just political. Everyone knows that regardless if they were created 10, 100, 1000 or 10 000 years ago. Same with all nation states.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 136 | Registered: Jul 2006 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 02:43 PM
——————————————————————————–
The Semitic speakers were not the first people to live in the Area. Eventhough Sumerian is no longer spoken in the Middle east we know that the Sumerians lived in the region. Many Amerindian groups live in and near Chicago,Amerindian languages are no longer spoken in the Chicago region, and the average Chicagoan does not carry Amerindian genes. As a result, just because many people in the area today speak Semitic languages and carry “Semitic genes” does not mean that the Natufians, who belonged to a different culture and ethnic group (i.e., negroes) than any Semitic group living in the Levant today, is not proof that the Natufians were Semitic speakers.

We know the people were called Anu, because the Sumerian texts claim that the original people in the area were Anu or Anunaki. Egyptians claimed the first rulers of Egypt were also called Anu.

The archaeologist referred to these Khoisan speakers as Bushman Hottentots. W.E. B. DuBois, discussed these Negroes in the The World and Africa, pp.86-89. DuBois noted that “There was once a an “uninterrupted belt’ of Negro culture from Central Europe to South Africa” (p.88).These people were smaller than Semitic speakers. Below is one of the early articles on the Natufians

quote:
——————————————————————————–

BONES OF CANNIBALS A PALESTINE RIDDLE
Wireless to THE NEW YORK TIMES.
New York Times 1857; Aug 4, 1932; ProQuest Historical Newspapers The New York Times (1851 – 2003)
pg. 21

Negroid people of 5000 B. C.Unlike Any Modern Race Described by Keith.

ATE BODIES OF ENEMIES
Men, Short of Stature, Burned Bones of Dead After Burial, London Session Hears.
TEETH OF WOMEN DRAWN
Linking relics to Burnt Skeletons from Ur scientist speculate an old cremation custom.

Wireless to NEW YORK TIMES London Aug. 3

Seven or eight thousand years ago in what geologist call modern times a race of negroid cannibals lived In Palestine, burned the bones of their dead after burial, and devoured the bodies of their enemies.
Skulls and thighbones of this race were unearthed within the last four years, first at Shukbah near Jerusalem and later in caves at Mount Carmel, and because they puzzled the excavators who found them they received the new name “Natufians.”
Today the first authoritative account of them was given by Sir Arthur Keith to the congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences and showed them to be one of the greatest riddles of archaeology.
They were clearly a Negroid people, said Sir Arthur, with wide faces flat- noses and long large heads.
They were short of stature 5 feet 3 or 4 inches tall-and their thighs and legs were remarkably strong.
——————————————————————————–

.
quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Mystery Solver:

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Mystery Solver:

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

The first people to dominate the area were the Sumerians.
——————————————————————————–

Would depend on time frame. For instance, who was dominant in the area during the “Natufian” inhabitation there?
——————————————————————————–

The founders of civilization in South West Asia were the Anu people, archaeologists call Natufians.
——————————————————————————–

You know this because…?

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

In Palestine the Natufians established intensive grass collection. The Natufians used the Ibero-Maurusian tool industry (see F. Wendorf, The
History of Nubia, Dallas,1968, pp.941-46).
——————————————————————————–

What do you think of as “Ibero-Maurusian”? Why that designation, when we are dealing with new microlithic tools originating in mainland Africa and transferred into the Levant via the Nile Valley?

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

I believe that the Natufians given the craniometric evidence for this group probably were San and/or Khoisan .
——————————————————————————–

What cranio-metric evidence has led you to that conclusion?

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

Up to today many Khoisan people live in East Africa, the origination point for the Natufian people. I would guess that the Natufians spoke a Khoisan language.
——————————————————————————–

No Khoisan language is known to occur in the “Near East”, but Afrasan languages do predominate in that region from the Levant downwards. What markers linguitics-wise and genetics-wise, would help us learn about this close Natufian-Khoisan linkage you speak of?
——————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

Doug M
Member
Member # 7650

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 02:52 PM
——————————————————————————–
The point that you are missing Mr. Winters is that the Anu were not the same as the San people. They may have been small statured, but that does not make them San. Just like Pygmies are not san people either, even though they are both indigenous African groups. The Anu were quite possibly closer to the Anu than the San, but seeing as no skeletal remains of these “anu” has been provided, how do we determine the relationship? Those skeletons referenced in the 1930s must still be around somewhere.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2434 | Registered: May 2005 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 03:00 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Doug M:
The point that you are missing Mr. Winters is that the Anu were not the same as the San people. They may have been small statured, but that does not make them San. Just like Pygmies are not san people either, even though they are both indigenous African groups. The Anu were quite possibly closer to the Anu than the San, but seeing as no skeletal remains of these “anu” has been provided, how do we determine the relationship? Those skeletons referenced in the 1930s must still be around somewhere.
——————————————————————————–

What makes you so sure they are not the Anu? Please cite the craniometric differences between the Natufians and the San and Khoisan people that lead you to this conclusion.

.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

Keins

Member
Member # 6476

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 03:32 PM
——————————————————————————–
This is a great topic guys. And I must commend on the civility of the discussion and exchange of ideas, information and respectable disagreement!

Kodos!
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 297 | From: PA. USA | Registered: Jan 2005 | IP: Logged |

Yonis2
Member
Member # 11348

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 03:54 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Clyde Winters wrote:
just because many people in the area today speak Semitic languages and carry “Semitic genes” does not mean that the Natufians, who belonged to a different culture and ethnic group (i.e., negroes) than any Semitic group living in the Levant today, is not proof that the Natufians were Semitic speakers.
——————————————————————————–

What is “negroid” according to you Clyde Winters?
Are all people (according to your citation above)of “wide faces flat- noses and long large heads” ” constitute of negroid people to you? And if thats so, what exactly do connect all these people other than these features? What gives you the energy to fight for these “wide faces flat- noses and long large heads” people throughout your career, you consider them all being of common proto-“negroid” origin? What exactly is your point?
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 136 | Registered: Jul 2006 | IP: Logged |

Djehuti
Member
Member # 6698

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 04:11 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Yonis2:

Couldn’t the same be said about Europe? I never see you say “Europe” is a fictious historical entity, why is that since you even acknowledge “European people” in the above post?
At the end of the day all these terms, middle east, europe, southeast asia etc are just political. Everyone knows that regardless if they were created 10, 100, 1000 or 10 000 years ago. Same with all nation states.
——————————————————————————–

The only difference is that ‘Europe’ was created by Europeans to describe themselves and which they accepted.

Also, the term is based on a definite region based on actual geography/geology, with Europe being an actual subcontinent.

Neither of these things above can be said about “Middle East”.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 10492 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005 | IP: Logged |

Djehuti
Member
Member # 6698

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 04:14 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by rasol:

quote:
——————————————————————————–
The controversy surrounding the Kushite/African/Black origins of the Elamites, Sumerians, Akkadians and “Assyrians” is simple and yet complicated. It involves both the racism exhibited toward the African slaves in the Western Hemisphere and Africans generally which led to the idea that Africans had no history ; and the need of Julius Oppert to make Semites white, to accommodate the “white” ancestry of European Jews.
——————————————————————————–

You can shorten this paragraph by saying that the controversy over the identiy of Kemetian, Kushites and Elamites rooted in racism….yes.

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Rawlinson was surprised during his research to discover that the founders of the Mesopotamian civilization were of Kushite origin. He made it clear that the Semitic speakers of Akkad and the non-Semitic speakers of Sumer were both Black or Negro people who called themselves sag-gig-ga “Black Heads”.
——————————————————————————–

I agree that Sumerians, like the Kemetians, referred to themselves as Blacks, that this reference is and always has been *ethnic* in character, and that this fact is so disturbing to Eurocentric racists, that they have gone to laughable lengths to invent alternate *explanations*, which for the most part, they don’t actually believe in, but assert effectively as pro-forma propaganda.

British scholar George Rawlinson is one of the 1st to translation Herodotus Histories correctly, in which Herodotus repeatedly refers to Egyptians, Ethiopians and others as Blacks.

EX:

– Still the Egyptians said that they believed the Colchians to be descended from the army of Sesostris. My own conjectures were founded, first, on the fact that they are black-skinned and have woolly hair

— Two black doves flew away from Egyptian Thebes, and while one directed its flight to Libya, the other came to them.

By calling the dove black the Dodonaeans indicated that the woman was an Egyptian.

http://www.piney.com/Heredotus2.html

It is interesting to observe in action – Eurocentrism at it’s most desparate and dissembling, tactics have included

– Deny use of the term ‘black’ to describe the Egyptians, and -blame- ‘afrocentric’ misreading – when in fact the early English language translations of Herodotus by Rawlinson and others *all* correctly translated Herodotus as saying such.

— Admit the use of the term black [thus contradicting the former denial], but claim that it doesn’t actually reference Egyptians, but rather Nubians.

Ex:
Herodotus believed this because the *Colchians were black skinned and woolly haired.*

For starters,Herodotus makes no claim that all of the Egyptians had these features and secondly black Nubian mercenaries served in the Egyptian army which would include Pharaoh Sesostris’s army.
https://yeyeolade.wordpress.com/category/black-is-beautiful/

^ This is a beautiful bit of dissembing.

It accuses others of misreading Herodotus, then puts words in Herodotus mouth [Nubians?] he never spoke, in order to evade what he actually said.

It ignores the fact that Herodotus is citing Black skin and Woolly hair as a *common feature* of Ethiopians, Egyptians and Colchians.

After all – he acribes Colchian and -Egyptian- origin, due to black skin and woolly hair -> not and Ethiopian origin due to *nubians* in Egyptian army.

It engages in the straw man argument that Herodotus did not state that *all* Egyptians or *all* Colchoi had these features. [he doesn’t say *all* Ethiopians had them, for that matter].

Of course what is relevant is that Blackness is cited by Herodotus as a common denominator and defining characteristic of all 3 groups, which is of course, exactly what is at issue!

So yes, Eurocentrists are desparate liars, and….they know this.
——————————————————————————–

I concur. The only fallacy now is Winters claiming that all these black peoples were Africans or “Kushites”. The Sumerians and Elamites were NOT African Kushites and neither were the Dravidians despite the fact that they are all black.

We have been through the reasons numerous times.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 10492 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005 | IP: Logged |

Yonis2
Member
Member # 11348

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 04:15 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Djehuti:

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Yonis2:

Couldn’t the same be said about Europe? I never see you say “Europe” is a fictious historical entity, why is that since you even acknowledge “European people” in the above post?
At the end of the day all these terms, middle east, europe, southeast asia etc are just political. Everyone knows that regardless if they were created 10, 100, 1000 or 10 000 years ago. Same with all nation states.
——————————————————————————–

The only difference is that ‘Europe’ was created by Europeans to describe themselves and which they accepted.

——————————————————————————–

Yes, but that still doesn’t make it less fictious than “middle east”.

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Also, the term is based on a definite region based on actual geography/geology, with Europe being an actual subcontinent.
——————————————————————————–

And how exactly does this differ from “middle east”? Neither Europe or Middle-East are continents of their own.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 136 | Registered: Jul 2006 | IP: Logged |

alTakruri

Member
Member # 10195

Member Rated:
posted 29 November, 2007 07:22 PM
——————————————————————————–
No doubt about certain of them being Kushites.
Kushite was ancient vernacular for what we call
black when we speak of black people or blackfolks.
Major doubt about any of them being “colonies”
from the greater continental African landmass.
Of course Colchians are the exception being
that they were described in classical times
as an exode from Egyptian army (but what of
their womefolk? I mean Medea was ???).

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Djehuti:
The only fallacy now is Winters claiming that all these black peoples were Africans or “Kushites”. The Sumerians and Elamites were NOT African Kushites and neither were the Dravidians despite the fact that they are all black.

——————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————–
Posts: 3354 | From: the Takrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006 | IP: Logged |

Mystery Solver
Member
Member # 9033

posted 29 November, 2007 11:24 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

The Semitic speakers were not the first people to live in the Area.
——————————————————————————–

And you heard that they were, from where?

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

Eventhough Sumerian is no longer spoken in the Middle east we know that the Sumerians lived in the region. Many Amerindian groups live in and near Chicago,Amerindian languages are no longer spoken in the Chicago region, and the average Chicagoan does not carry Amerindian genes.
——————————————————————————–

Non-issue.

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

As a result, just because many people in the area today speak Semitic languages and carry “Semitic genes” does not mean that the Natufians, who belonged to a different culture and ethnic group (i.e., negroes) than any Semitic group living in the Levant today, is not proof that the Natufians were Semitic speakers.
——————————————————————————–

Another non-issue. You were asked for preponderance of evidence that shows strong links between Natufians and Khoisans.

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

We know the people were called Anu, because the Sumerian texts claim that the original people in the area were Anu or Anunaki. Egyptians claimed the first rulers of Egypt were also called Anu.
——————————————————————————–

How does this prove any link with the Natufians, even if one were to go with your idea that Sumerian texts’ reference to “Anunaki” is referencing the same group designated as “Anu” in the Nile Valley? The Natufian complex precedes the arrival or “appearance” of Sumerians in the region by a significant time gap.

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

The archaeologist referred to these Khoisan speakers as Bushman Hottentots. W.E. B. DuBois, discussed these Negroes in the The World and Africa, pp.86-89. DuBois noted that “There was once a an “uninterrupted belt’ of Negro culture from Central Europe to South Africa” (p.88).These people were smaller than Semitic speakers. Below is one of the early articles on the Natufians
——————————————————————————–

So stature is supposedly the determinant that you are going by, with this tenuous strong link between Natufians and Khoisans? How does this even address what was asked of you; i.e., the cranio-metric tendencies that suggest very strong link between Natufians and Khoisans, not to leave out genetic and linguistic evidence?
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 1622 | Registered: Sep 2005 | IP: Logged |

Djehuti
Member
Member # 6698

Member Rated:
posted 30 November, 2007 12:37 AM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Yonis2:

Yes, but that still doesn’t make it less fictious than “middle east”.
——————————————————————————–

It does if you consider the very real geographical and geological basis! Europe borders the rest of Asia by the Ural mountains and straits seperating it from Asia Minor. Now what natural borders define the “Middle East”??

quote:
——————————————————————————–
And how exactly does this differ from “middle east”? Neither Europe or Middle-East are continents of their own.
——————————————————————————–

But geologically Europe is a subcontinent in that it essentially is a continent of its own that was once seperate eons ago but later fused to the rest of Asia, so too is the case with India. What about “Middle East”? You cannot say the same about this political region.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 10492 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005 | IP: Logged |

Marc Washington
Member
Member # 10979

Member Rated:
posted 30 November, 2007 04:40 AM
——————————————————————————–
Here are other images of the population in Mesopotamia before the deluge from the Steppes swept them away:

http://www.beforebc.de/400_neareast/02-16-500-SM.akk-57-050-08.html

http://www.beforebc.de/400_neareast/02-16-500-SM.bab-01.html
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 441 | Registered: May 2006 | IP: Logged |

Marc Washington
Member
Member # 10979

Member Rated:
posted 30 November, 2007 05:59 AM
——————————————————————————–
The thread deals with Africa, Semites, and the Near East. There is the possibility, or rather, history supports the fact that these three (before whites at any given stage entered theses societies) are one; and were the founding peoples and civilization of Europe as well:

http://www.beforebc.de/all_europe/02-16-500-00-07.html
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 441 | Registered: May 2006 | IP: Logged |

Doug M
Member
Member # 7650

Member Rated:
posted 30 November, 2007 08:01 AM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Doug M:
The point that you are missing Mr. Winters is that the Anu were not the same as the San people. They may have been small statured, but that does not make them San. Just like Pygmies are not san people either, even though they are both indigenous African groups. The Anu were quite possibly closer to the Anu than the San, but seeing as no skeletal remains of these “anu” has been provided, how do we determine the relationship? Those skeletons referenced in the 1930s must still be around somewhere.
——————————————————————————–

What makes you so sure they are not the Anu? Please cite the craniometric differences between the Natufians and the San and Khoisan people that lead you to this conclusion.

.
——————————————————————————–

Primarily because the ANU no longer EXIST, while the pygmies and San people DO EXIST and ARE NOT the same. That is why Pygmies are pygmies and San are San. Just because all three groups were short statured people DOES NOT MAKE THEM the same people, culturally, linguistically or ethnically.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2434 | Registered: May 2005 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 30 November, 2007 08:17 AM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Doug M:

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Doug M:
The point that you are missing Mr. Winters is that the Anu were not the same as the San people. They may have been small statured, but that does not make them San. Just like Pygmies are not san people either, even though they are both indigenous African groups. The Anu were quite possibly closer to the Anu than the San, but seeing as no skeletal remains of these “anu” has been provided, how do we determine the relationship? Those skeletons referenced in the 1930s must still be around somewhere.
——————————————————————————–

What makes you so sure they are not the Anu? Please cite the craniometric differences between the Natufians and the San and Khoisan people that lead you to this conclusion.

.
——————————————————————————–

Primarily because the ANU no longer EXIST, while the pygmies and San people DO EXIST and ARE NOT the same. That is why Pygmies are pygmies and San are San. Just because all three groups were short statured people DOES NOT MAKE THEM the same people, culturally, linguistically or ethnically.
——————————————————————————–

Archaeologist compared the skeletal remains of San and Khoisan people in South Africa and the ancient peoples of Europe and Asia, that is how it was determined that the same people who live in South Africa where spread throughout the world thousands of years ago.

You don’t know what you’re talking about. For example, Egyptians no longer exist as a monolithic group but linguuistics and anthropology have have shown us that they are related to Africans now living in other parts of Africa, in addition to the Coptic people who, in many cases fail to look phenotypically like the ancient Egyptians depicted in ancient Egyptian art.

Moreover, we may never really know the language spoken by the pygmies who have been found on every continent: the Americas, Africa and Asia. This is due to the fact that the languages they speak is usually the language spoken by majority population they live among.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

Neith-Athena
Member
Member # 10040

Rate Member posted 30 November, 2007 11:59 AM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by alTakruri:
No doubt about certain of them being Kushites.
Kushite was ancient vernacular for what we call
black when we speak of black people or blackfolks.
Major doubt about any of them being “colonies”
from the greater continental African landmass.
Of course Colchians are the exception being
that they were described in classical times
as an exode from Egyptian army (but what of
their womefolk? I mean Medea was ???).

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Djehuti:
The only fallacy now is Winters claiming that all these black peoples were Africans or “Kushites”. The Sumerians and Elamites were NOT African Kushites and neither were the Dravidians despite the fact that they are all black.

——————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————–

I was just about to write a post about that. We read Medea in one of my classes, and reading about her being from Colchis, then remembering what Herodotus said about them, I wondered whether she was Black or had Black ancestry. The English translation had no mention of ethnic reference. She kicks ass in the play, but I am not exactly sure I want a mother who kills her own children to be Black, as Black women already get enough bad press, with welfare mothers and all.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 102 | From: USA | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

Djehuti
Member
Member # 6698

Member Rated:
posted 30 November, 2007 04:09 PM
——————————————————————————–
^ The story that she kills her own children is a later rendition of the legend no doubt made by Greeks to further deomonize her. In earlier accounts, her children were murdered by political enemies of her marriage to Jason. Notice that in the story she was not only a princess but a high-priestess with great mystical power. It was only in later times that Greek men made her into an “evil witch” capable of killing her own children out of spite.

You’re right that in all the accounts (at least those I’ve read) there were no ‘racial’ or physical descriptions of her other than that she was beautiful.

Getting somewhat back to the topic why is there such a comparison in stature between San and Pygmies?? Yes, San are generally short but NOT like Pygmies which are much shorter thus the description ‘Pgymy’!
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 10492 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005 | IP: Logged |

tooSleepy
Junior Member
Member # 14307

Rate Member posted 01 December, 2007 03:38 AM
——————————————————————————–
This Akkadian hooked nose mask gives me Saudi vibe.

Saudi Men

——————————————————————————–
Posts: 12 | Registered: Oct 2007 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 01 December, 2007 08:57 AM
——————————————————————————–
The picture you published regarding the Akkadians is a fake. It looks more “Saudi” because the artist’s who made the mask was trying to make it fit the contemporary people who live in the area.
Below you can compare the original and fake mask. The nose of the original is not hooked.
.

.

Sargon
Original

Fakes

.

.

Naram-Sin Original
.

.
Fake

——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

Mike111
Member
Member # 9361

Rate Member posted 01 December, 2007 10:39 AM
——————————————————————————–
Sleepy; were you seriously trying to suggest that the current rulers of Arabia are the indigenous people? Maybe you also think that current Iraqis, Iranians, Egyptians, Libyans, and those in the place now called Turkey are also indigenous people. Try Turks, with a little Greek and Roman thrown in – and the resultant mixtures.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 48 | Registered: Oct 2005 | IP: Logged |

Doug M
Member
Member # 7650

Member Rated:
posted 01 December, 2007 04:26 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
The picture you published regarding the Akkadians is a fake. It looks more “Saudi” because the artist’s who made the mask was trying to make it fit the contemporary people who live in the area.
Below you can compare the original and fake mask. The nose of the original is not hooked.
.

.

Sargon
Original

Fakes

.

.

Naram-Sin Original
.

.
Fake

——————————————————————————–

Mr. Winters all of those images are of the same person and none of them are different from one another. This is a blatantly false misrepresentation of the artifacts that does not show what you are implying, which is any FAKE forms of these statues or busts that you can single out as being more “arab” like.

This is a lie and the post is nonsense.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2434 | Registered: May 2005 | IP: Logged |

Djehuti
Member
Member # 6698

Member Rated:
posted 01 December, 2007 05:08 PM
——————————————————————————–
^ LOL What else do you expect from Winters?
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 10492 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005 | IP: Logged |

tooSleepy
Junior Member
Member # 14307

Rate Member posted 02 December, 2007 03:15 AM
——————————————————————————–
lol Winter
Sorry dude it is the same mask with the impressed nose tip and his straight hair commend to a bun.

Sleepy; were you seriously trying to suggest that the current rulers of Arabia are the indigenous people? Maybe you also think that current Iraqis, Iranians, Egyptians, Libyans, and those in the place now called Turkey are also indigenous people. Try Turks, with a little Greek and Roman thrown in – and the resultant mixtures.

Haplogroup J
30000 thousand years not enough?
Haplogroup J is believed to have arisen 31,700 years ago (plus or minus 12,800 years) in the Near East (Semino et al. 2004). It is most closely related to Haplogroup I, as both Haplogroup I and Haplogroup J are descendants of Haplogroup IJ (S2, S22). Haplogroup IJ is in turn derived from Haplogroup F. The main current subgroups J1 and J2, which now account between them for almost all of the population of the haplogroup, are both believed to have arisen very early, at least 10,000 years ago.

Actually Europeans are the ones who are partly Middle Eastern spin-offs.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 12 | Registered: Oct 2007 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 02 December, 2007 08:44 AM
——————————————————————————–
The figure you posted is a fake as demonstrated above.

Haplogroup J could not have arisen in the Middle East around 30,000 years ago because the area was still occupied by Neanderthals. Moreover, around this time the Cro-Magnon people who were expansing eastward from Iberia carried the N haplogroup.

Moreover the J haplogroup is also found among the Ethiopians. Given the linguistic evidence that the Akkadians and Ethiopians were closely related suggest supports the Africaness of these people, not Arabness.

.

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by tooSleepy:
lol Winter
Sorry dude it is the same mask with the impressed nose tip and his straight hair commend to a bun.

Sleepy; were you seriously trying to suggest that the current rulers of Arabia are the indigenous people? Maybe you also think that current Iraqis, Iranians, Egyptians, Libyans, and those in the place now called Turkey are also indigenous people. Try Turks, with a little Greek and Roman thrown in – and the resultant mixtures.

Haplogroup J
30000 thousand years not enough?
Haplogroup J is believed to have arisen 31,700 years ago (plus or minus 12,800 years) in the Near East (Semino et al. 2004). It is most closely related to Haplogroup I, as both Haplogroup I and Haplogroup J are descendants of Haplogroup IJ (S2, S22). Haplogroup IJ is in turn derived from Haplogroup F. The main current subgroups J1 and J2, which now account between them for almost all of the population of the haplogroup, are both believed to have arisen very early, at least 10,000 years ago.

Actually Europeans are the ones who are partly Middle Eastern spin-offs.
——————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

Clyde Winters

Member
Member # 10129

Member Rated:
posted 02 December, 2007 10:37 AM
——————————————————————————–
This the original picture you posted it has nothing to do with the figure I posted. Note that the left eye in the figure you posted was normal, whereas the left eye in the figure below is missing. You should be ashamed of yourself. But like most Eurocentrists you don’t mind lying to advance a LIE.

.

.

.

.

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by tooSleepy:
This Akkadian hooked nose mask gives me Saudi vibe.

Saudi Men

——————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————–
Posts: 2509 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006 | IP: Logged |

alTakruri

Member
Member # 10195

Member Rated:
posted 02 December, 2007 11:08 AM
——————————————————————————–
Those aren’t different bust profiles.
The image was mirror flipped, that’s all.
Besides publishers mistakenly doing it
anyone with PhotoShop or Picasso or etc., can do it too.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 3354 | From: the Takrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006 | IP: Logged |

Evergreen
Member
Member # 12192

Rate Member posted 02 December, 2007 01:59 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
The Sumerians were conquered by the Akkadians the Akkadians spoke a Semitic language. The linguistic evidence makes it clear that the Akkadians originated in the Sudan,migrated across East Africa into Arabia and replaced the Sumerians as the dominate group in Mesopotamia.
——————————————————————————–

Evergreen Posts:

Domesticated Animals from Early Times by Juliet Clutton-Brock

Author(s) of Review: Juris Zarins
The Biblical Archaeologist, Vol. 45, No. 4 (Autumn, 1982), pp. 251-253

“The possibility of cattle pastoralism’s having originated in conjunction with early agricultural practices in southern
Egypt must now be seriously considered along with the possible diffusion of Neolithic cattle
pastoralism into the Sahara, south to East Africa, and across the Red Sea to the SinaiINegev and the Arabian peninsula.”
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 655 | From: Washington State | Registered: Oct 2006 | IP: Logged |

Evergreen
Member
Member # 12192

Rate Member posted 02 December, 2007 02:07 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by tooSleepy:

Haplogroup J
30000 thousand years not enough?
Haplogroup J is believed to have arisen 31,700 years ago (plus or minus 12,800 years) in the Near East (Semino et al. 2004). It is most closely related to Haplogroup I, as both Haplogroup I and Haplogroup J are descendants of Haplogroup IJ (S2, S22). Haplogroup IJ is in turn derived from Haplogroup F. The main current subgroups J1 and J2, which now account between them for almost all of the population of the haplogroup, are both believed to have arisen very early, at least 10,000 years ago.

Actually Europeans are the ones who are partly Middle Eastern spin-offs.
——————————————————————————–

Evergreen Writes:

What is the correlation between the evolution of modern Eurasian phenotype and haplogroup J. Cranial and genetic evidence indicates that the earliest Europeans shared phenotypic traits with modern and ancient Sub-Saharan Africans.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 655 | From: Washington State | Registered: Oct 2006 | IP: Logged |

Evergreen
Member
Member # 12192

Rate Member posted 02 December, 2007 02:20 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by rasol:
[QUOTE]I agree that Sumerians, like the Kemetians, referred to themselves as Blacks, that this reference is and always has been *ethnic* in character, and that this fact is so disturbing to Eurocentric racists, that they have gone to laughable lengths to invent alternate *explanations*, which for the most part, they don’t actually believe in, but assert effectively as pro-forma propaganda.
——————————————————————————–

Evergreen Writes:

It seems most probable that two types existed in the Tigres-Euphrates area by the early neolithic – a modified “Australoid” type that was spread from Australia, through India and into the vicinity of modern Iran/Iraq. There was also a semitic element that spread out of Africa and around the so-called fertile cresent during the early Holocene. A third, chariot-wielding element may have entered the region during the Bronze Age.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 655 | From: Washington State | Registered: Oct 2006 | IP: Logged |

Evergreen
Member
Member # 12192

Rate Member posted 02 December, 2007 03:37 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Evergreen:
[QUOTE]
It seems most probable that two types existed in the Tigres-Euphrates area by the early neolithic – a modified “Australoid” type that was spread from Australia, through India and into the vicinity of modern Iran/Iraq. There was also a semitic element that spread out of Africa and around the so-called fertile cresent during the early Holocene. A third, chariot-wielding element may have entered the region during the Bronze Age.
——————————————————————————–

Evergreen Writes:

Further to this point, it seems that populations stretching from Senegal to Australia shared in the common M1 mtDNA lineage. These populations were Black and known as Eastern and Western Ethiopians (Blacks) by ancient Eurasians. These Black populations also seemed to have recognized their own Blackness with references to Kush/Kham/Ham/Kish evolving in relation to the emergence of chariot-wielding elements that may have entered the region during the EBA.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 655 | From: Washington State | Registered: Oct 2006 | IP: Logged |

Evergreen
Member
Member # 12192

Rate Member posted 02 December, 2007 04:13 PM
——————————————————————————–

quote:
——————————————————————————–
Originally posted by Evergreen:
[QUOTE]

Further to this point, it seems that populations stretching from Senegal to Australia shared in the common M1 mtDNA lineage.
——————————————————————————–

Evergreen Writes:

In fact, this is where I would lean more toward the Clyde Winters/Marc Washnington camp. Not so much that I believe the Olmec were Nubians who fled the Nile when the Ptolmies closed down the temples in Aswan or that the Sumerians were ancient chariot-riding mandingoes from the Sahara. But I do believe that Europeans are closely aligned with Africans based upon the linear knowledge (science, mathematics, religion, writing, etc.) Africans imparted to Europeans during the current Quran (Holocene). Likewise, I believe Black-Asians are closely aligned with Africans based upon the instinctive knowledge (memory of Australian Aborigines) they took with them when they left Africa during the UP. Unlike northern Eurasians, Black-Asians RETAINED this African instinct in tandem with an essentially African physiology.
——————————————————————————–
Posts: 655 | From: Washington State | Registered: Oct 2006 | IP: Logged |

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins

Printer-friendly view of this topic Hop To: Select a Forum: Visiting Egypt Living in Egypt Ancient Egypt and Egyptology Music & Movies Politics Doing Business in Egypt Eat like an Egyptian Share Your Egyptian Experiences/Love & Marriage chat Religion Classifieds Egyptians Living Abroad Locate a friend or business in Egypt

Contact Us | EgyptSearch!


%d bloggers like this: