from arguewitheveryone.com

Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > Race Issues
Where Whites Came From, and Why They are Racist

Seasoned Veteran Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 45

Where Whites Came From, and Why They are Racist


Here’s scientific and genetic proof concerning where white people come from. This Article is just one of hundreds that can be found on the internet. There are also hundreds of books written about where white people come from, and also suggest that this is the real and main reason why white people are racist towards black people for no valid reason, and minorities, too. Read on!

“Scientists have discovered a tiny genetic mutation that largely explains the first appearance of white skin in humans tens of thousands of years ago, a finding that helps solve one of biology’s most enduring mysteries and illuminates one of humanity’s greatest sources of strife.
The work suggests that the skin-whitening mutation occurred by chance in a single individual after the first human exodus from Africa, when all people were brown-skinned. That person’s offspring apparently thrived as humans moved northward into what is now Europe, helping to give rise to the lightest of the world’s races. (This is not quit right, albinos started in Africa, and still exist in Africa today-and they come from two black parents, just like the first white people who lived in what is now called Europe-go to these websites and see pictures for yourself: Stichting Afrikaanse Albino’s (Article is called, “Stichting Afrikaanse Albino’s) and Stichting Afrikaanse Albino’s

The findings show just how small a biological difference is reflected by skin color. the newly found mutation involves a change of just one letter of DNA Code out of the 3.1 billion letters of the human genome–the complete instructions for making a human being.
The work raises a raft of new questions–not least of which is why white skin caught on so thoroughly in northern climates once it arose. Some scientists suggest that lighter skin offered a strong survival advantage for people who migrated out of Africa by boosting their levels of bone-strengthening Vitamin D.

Even study leader Keith Cheng said he was at first uncomfortable talking about the new work, fearing that the finding of such a clear genetic difference between people of African and European ancestries might reawaken discredited assertions of other purported inborn differences between races.

The discovery, described in the Journal Science, was an unexpected outgrowth of studies Cheng and his colleagues were conducting on the inch-long zebra fish, which are popular research tools for geneticists and developmental biologists. Having identified a gene that, when mutated, interferes with its ability to make its characteristic black stripes, the team scanned human DNA Databases to see if a similar gene resides in people.
To their surprise, they found virtually identical pigment-building genes in humans, chickens, dogs, cows and many others species, an indication of its biological value. They got a bigger surprise when they looked in a new database comparing the genomes of four of the world’s major racial groups. It showed that whites with northern and western European ancestry have a mutated version of the gene.

Skin color is a reflection of the amount and distribution of the pigment melanin, which in humans protects against damaging ultraviolet rays but in other species is also used for camouflage or other purposes. The mutation that deprives zebra fish of their stripes blocks the creation of a protein whose job is to move charged atoms across cell membranes, an obscure process that is crucial to the accumulation of melanin inside cells.
Humans of European descent, Cheng’s team found, bear a slightly different mutation that hobbles the same protein with similar effect. The defect does not affect melanin deposition in other parts of the body, including the hair and eyes, whose tints are under the control of other genes.

A few genes have previously been associated with human pigment disorders — most notably those that, when mutated, lead to albinism, an extreme form of pigment loss. But the newly found glitch is the first found to play a role in the formation of white skin.
The Penn State team calculates that the gene, known as slc24a5, is responsible for about one-third of the pigment loss that made black skin white. A few other as-yet-unidentified mutated genes apparently account for the rest. Although precise dating is impossible, several scientists speculated on the basis of its spread and variation that the mutation arose between 20,000 and 50,000 years ago. That would be consistent with research showing that a wave of ancestral humans migrated northward and eastward out of Africa about 50,000 years ago.

The finding’s most immediate impact may be an escalating debate about the meaning of race. Recent revelations that all people are more than 99.9 percent genetically identical has proved that race has almost no biological validity. Yet geneticists’ claims that race is a phony construct have not rung true to many nonscientists — and understandably so, said Vivian Ota Wang of the National Human Genome Research Institute in Bethesda. ” —
The Washington Post Company…

White people are ashamed of themselves-but are in denial of this obvious fact of course, and so they try to project their own sense of shame onto black people specifically, and other darker minority groups, because it is white people who changed from the black norm, and it was white people who raped the black African race in order to try and make it white like themselves, and try to coverup the fact that they are a direct mutation from the black African Race-not a mixture of other ethnic groups. However, minorities came into existance first by the rape by the whites from the caucusus mountain of the black Africans they mutated from. These barbaric whites did this, because they thought they could create more whites by doing so. However, they only created more blacks, and minorities, because whites are genetically recessive to both blacks and minorities, whose genes are dominate, and because white people are nothing more than a lighter version of the blacks they mutated from. Now, because of all the raping whites did during slavery, and colonization of other people’s nations, the albino gene that they carry now exists in all so called races of people, so both black and minority races now have a mutation in their skin colors every now and then which results in a white skinned person. However, white people are not, and never where the original people, nor the creators of mankind. The original man was and still is black and brown skinned.

For further references, here are just a few of thousands:

1. Origin of The White Race called the Devils: A history of the origin of the white race called the devils
2. National Organization for Albinism and Hyperpigmentation-“NOAH”: NOAH – The National Organization for Albinism and Hypopigmentation’
3. Where Did Whites Come From?– Where Did White People Come From? — Brotha Science Kicks tha knowledge
4. Only Two Races–http://www.freewebs.com/caucasoid_caucasian/tworace


  1. Richard Says:

    This attempt to explain the origin of man by evolution is not satisfying at all!Why should phrases like by “chance” something happened be used? What about the very begining of whatever that is believed to have evolved come from? its better we belive the Biblical creation theory because its more meaningful, it depicts an overall person in charge of everything , who is ominipotent,omnipresent and ominicient.Let not so called scientists be led astray and misuse the abilities that God gave them,afterall, this is the work of the Devil!

  2. Yeshua Yahweh Says:

    I agree Richard. This is clearly the work of the Devil. Science has proven what the Bible said all along. We are all one blood. Adam and Eve were pre programed in their DNA to produce a wide spectrum of variety. So were the animals. Science calls this micro evolution. We call it variety of species after their kind. All people are variety of species descended from Adam and Eve.

    For evolution to take place would require Macro evolution. One kind coming from another kind. This would require information being added to DNA, something that does not happen. We have a God who loves variety. He wanted all nations and ethnic groups to love Him and be His children. Not to hate one another.

    It has already been proven the the entire concept of race is completely bogus. Charles Darwin was a racist who believed some races were superior to others. This kind of thinking led to slavery and the Holocaust. The Bible is opposed to evolutionary thinking because it leads to hatred of other people.

  3. Yeshua Yahweh Says:

    Jesus said the entire law hangs on the first two commandments:

    1. “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind.”

    The second is like it:

    2.” Love your neighbor as you love yourself.”

    Let’s not forget that Jesus said, “anyone that hates his fellow man does not know God.”

  4. M. Ann Says:

    All of mankind stem from two individuals – Adam and Eve. It has been studied and there is evidence that all humans have a connecting DNA called Myochondria. This DNA has been traced back to Africa, the origin of mankind. So, yes, we are all brothers and sisters. And, yes, race is a construct which has been used to separate individuals into categories of superior and inferior. There is great debate among individuals in regards to evolution versus religion. In my opinion those that scream evolution want to dismiss religion because then they would not have to follow the teachings of the Bible. The Bible does not teach hate and separation. It teaches love and acceptance of all individuals regardless of skin color.

  5. CON Says:


  6. Shulaa-Teq Says:

    I see the Article as plausible. Like science, the Biblical too is swiss cheese and can not be looked at as a definitive work of fact, but a work of Art. Now I do not want to come down on anyones faith/ belief, but the Bible dose teach separation, mass murder, and rape among other things; and condones a lot of it. Every Bible and or Torah clearly show the Ysra’Elites where told to obliterate the Canaanites and rape their women, as well as to separate from any who is not one of their own and or follow the precepts (Mussar) and law (Halakhah). Now, I’m just as Spiritual and or Religious (if you will) as the next but the article clearly backs up what the Scriptures states, that the White man is an off shoot of a common Black ancestor, cold this ancestor be lets say, “NOAH”. Could the seed of Yaphet produce an albino child as they adapted to newer climates while they migrated. As a child I was taught that, “Evolution is the method by which Creation maintains existence”. The catch phase is ADAPTATION. Since it cannot be disputed, I’ll do like everyone else and stick to my own thing.

  7. John Says:

    Even in the bible, their are many references to white skin as a genetic deficiency and as a result to disobedience, it is called leprosy. Leprosy turned the skin “white as snow” according to the book of kings. The original man and women were African (black by modern standards). Whites are a freak of nature. There is only one original race and that is the black race.

  8. Lucifer Says:

    You can say this until you are blue in the face but how are you going to convince white people to give up their mutation and stop mating with each other?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: